[ad_1]
CervicalCheck activist Vicky Phelan has said she should keep looking for cancer treatment options after discovering a new tumor in her lung.
Limerick’s mother is determined to keep fighting for what her campaign group 221+ believes is a fair court approach to dealing with the CervicalCheck controversy that her own legal case first exposed.
One amendment that campaign advocates want for the current structure is to ensure that any woman whose cancer returns can return to court to claim additional costs, as had been the case with HIV and hepatitis compensation schemes.
“We know from cervical cancer that if it comes back; it’s fatal, it’s that simple, ”he said.
“We have seen it with Ruth Morrissey (who died in July), we have seen it with Emma Mhic Mhathúna (who died in 2018). I’m going to see it; My cancer is back and I’m literally buying time, that’s all I do at this stage. I’m going to die, I know. “
Ms Phelan explained that although her cancer had never gone away, but had remained stable, the recent discovery of a tumor is the first in more than two years.
“Women don’t survive if he comes back. That’s all we are asking for, is to allow women who are taking cases that are currently cancer free, who are in remission, to come back. [to the tribunal] if his cancer comes back, “he told RTÉ’s Drive Time program on Monday.
In recent days, Ms Phelan said she felt “betrayed” by Health Minister Stephen Donnelly for his formal establishment of the CervicalCheck court, despite assurances that it would be delayed.
He said court-related problems continue and his group is currently consulting its members and obtaining legal advice.
“The minister gave us guarantees. . . that he would pause the court, so it was very, very disappointing for us that the order [for it to begin] it had been assigned and it couldn’t be stopped, ”he said.
“I think that is what people, including the Minister, forget; that this court is designed to meet the needs of women and families affected by the CervicalCheck scandal ”.
In relation to her own ongoing battle with the disease, Ms Phelan said there are not many treatment options, but she remains determined to fight for the correct terms of the court before stepping back to focus on her health.
“This is a disease that affects very young women with young families,” she said. “All these women are leaving young children behind, or in some cases [they are] women who haven’t had a chance to have a family, so why wouldn’t you try to do everything you can to try to help as many women as you can? [to] not go through what I’m going through? It’s as simple as that.”
[ad_2]