[ad_1]
A DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS has launched legal proceedings against former US President Donald Trump for the deadly insurrection on the US Capitol last month.
Mississippi Rep. Bennie Thompson is also taking a federal case against Trump for conspiring with his lawyer and extremist groups to try to prevent Congress from certifying the results of last year’s presidential election.
The lawsuit by Thompson, chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, is part of an expected wave of litigation over the January 6 riot and is believed to be the first filed by a member of Congress.
Seeks unspecified punitive and compensatory damages.
The case also names Rudy Giuliani and groups such as the Proud Boys and the Oath Keepers, extremist organizations that had members accused by the Justice Department of participating in the siege.
A Trump adviser, Jason Miller, said in a statement that the former president did not organize the rally that preceded the riot and that “he did not incite or conspire to incite violence on Capitol Hill on January 6.”
The rioters march to the United States Capitol on January 6
Source: Carolyn Kaster
Ku Klux Klan law
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Washington under a Reconstruction-era law known as the Ku Klux Klan Act, comes days after Trump was acquitted in a Senate impeachment that focused on accusations that he incited the riot, in which five people died.
That acquittal is likely to open the door to new legal scrutiny of Trump’s actions before and during the siege.
Other members of Congress or law enforcement officials injured responding to the riots could file additional lawsuits.
Even some Republicans who voted in favor of Trump’s acquittal on Saturday recognized that the most appropriate place to deal with the former president was the courts, especially now that he has left the White House and lost certain legal protections that protected him.
Thompson’s lawsuit follows the extensive effort by Trump and Giuliani to question the election results despite the fact that courts across the country and state election officials repeatedly rejected his baseless allegations of fraud.
Despite evidence to the contrary, the suit says, the men described the election as stolen as Trump “supported rather than discouraged” threats of violence from his angry supporters in the weeks leading up to the assault on the Capitol.
“The carefully orchestrated series of events that unfolded at the Save America rally and the assault on the Capitol was not an accident or a coincidence,” he says.
“It was the anticipated and predictable culmination of a carefully coordinated campaign to interfere with the legal process required to confirm the count of votes cast in the Electoral College.”
Responsibilities as President
Historically, presidents enjoy broad immunity from lawsuits for actions taken in their role as commander-in-chief.
But the lawsuit filed Tuesday was filed against Trump in a personal, unofficial capacity and alleges that none of the behaviors in question had to do with his responsibilities as president.
“Inciting a riot, or attempting to interfere with congressional efforts to ratify the election results that are recommended by the constitution, could not be conceived within the scope of the ordinary responsibilities of the president,” Joseph Sellers, a lawyer who along with the NAACP filed the lawsuit on Thompson’s behalf, he said in an interview.
“In this sense, due to his conduct, he is like any other private citizen.”
The lawsuit more broadly accuses Trump of conspiring to disrupt the constitutional activities of Congress, that is, the certification of election results establishing Joe Biden as the rightful winner, through a months-long effort to discredit the outcome and lean on individual states and yours. vice president to revoke the contest.
The case against Trump was brought under a provision of the Ku Klux Klan Act of 1871, which was passed in response to KKK violence and prohibits violence or intimidation intended to prevent Congress or other federal officials from carrying out carry out their constitutional duties.
“Fortunately, this has not been used much,” Sellers said.
“But what we see here is unprecedented – it really is reminiscent of what led to the enactment of this legislation right after the Civil War.
No news is bad news
Support the magazine
You contributions help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you
Support us now
The lawsuit cites inflammatory remarks that Trump and Giuliani made in the weeks leading up to the riot and on the day of the riot that lawyers say were designed to mobilize supporters to work to overturn the election results and avoid the certification process. of the Senate.
That process was temporarily halted when Trump loyalists stormed the Capitol.
Trump told supporters at a pre-riot rally to “fight like hell,” but the former president’s lawyers flatly denied during impeachment that he had incited the riot.
They pointed to a comment during his speech in which he told the crowd to behave “in peace” that day.
Defense attorneys are likely to review those claims in the lawsuit.
They can also argue, as was done during the impeachment case, that Trump’s speech was protected by the First Amendment.
[ad_2]