Joanne Hayes and her family ask the court to find the Kerry Babies Court’s findings unfounded and incorrect



[ad_1]

JOANNE HAYES, THE woman who was wrongfully accused of murdering a baby more than 35 years ago, and her siblings want the Superior Court to declare that all findings or irregularities the Court made against them in the Kerry Babies case were unfounded and incorrect .

Hayes and his brothers Edmund, Kathleen and Michael Hayes are seeking the statements in an attempt to finalize matters related to the events of the mid-1980s and to vindicate the good name of the family.

In 1984, she and members of her family were arrested by Gardaí after the discovery of a newborn baby with multiple stab wounds in Cahersiveen, South Kerry, about 50 miles from Ms. Hayes’ home in Abbeydorney in the North Kerry.

The parents of that child, named baby John, have never been identified, nor has his killer.
She was accused of being the mother of baby John and of murdering him. His family was accused of concealing the birth of a child.

Following her arrest in May 1984, Ms Hayes and her family say that following the wrongful acts committed by the Gardaí, they were forced to make false confessions admitting to the murder of baby John, which they later withdrew.

The charges that they were all innocent were dropped in October 1984. Ms. Hayes had given birth to a boy, named Shane, on April 13, 1984 at the family farm, but that boy died and was buried at the family farm.

She claims that a proper investigation of the matter by gardaí would have eliminated her and her family as persons of concern.

Her arrest, questioning and indictment were inappropriate after a blood test in May 1984 made it clear that she was not the mother of baby John.

She was also at one point in the investigation accused by Gardaí of having given birth to twins, which she says she used for the purpose of maliciously prosecuting them continuously in court.

Court

A Court of Inquiry, known as the Kerry Babies Court, led by then-Judge Kevin Lynch, was established and heard in late 1984 to early 1985.

Ms. Hayes and her family say the report contained numerous findings against her that were false, unfounded, not supported by any evidence, and purely speculative.

The findings against her include that Ms. Hayes assaulted her newborn son with a toilet brush and strangled him to death.

This finding was unfounded and was made despite the fact that former state pathologist Dr. John Harbison, who performed an autopsy, was unable to determine Shane’s cause of death.

The Court also wrongly found, they claim, that the Hayes family lied to the court, that they were involved in an attempted cover-up regarding Shane’s death, and that they had lied and made false accusations against the Gardaí.

The court also inferred, without explanation, that the false confessions made by the Hayes family stemmed from a guilty conscience. The family says there was no basis for these findings.

It also claims that during the hearing the court showed bias and lack of fair procedures by allowing gardaí to hint that she was “promiscuous”, “a woman of loose morals”, to make unfounded statements about her relationship with Jeremiah Locke, her former partner and about her sexual history.

An inappropriate analogy that the Court allowed to use was the argument that Joanne Hayes had given birth to twins from two different parents, in circumstances in which medical experts elsewhere said it was unfounded.

The court also showed bias when it allowed the public broadcast of medical expert testimony on Ms. Hayes’ private health and gynecological details, when it had the power to do so in private.

During the court it is alleged that gardaí took false and unjustifiable positions by stating that none of the Hayes family members were stressed or upset during their interrogations, and that the interrogation was not related to the baby John, but to the pregnancy of the Mrs. Hayes.

Sorry

In 2018, Ms Hayes de Tralee in Co Kerry received apologies for her treatment of both the then Taoiseach and the current Tánaiste Leo Varadkar on behalf of the State, and the then Acting Commissioner of the Garda Dónall Ó Cualáin.

# Open journalism

No news is bad news
Support the magazine

your contributions help us continue to deliver the stories that are important to you

Support us now

The brothers took action in High Court against the Garda Commissioner, the Irish Minister of Justice and the Attorney General, where she requested various statements and compensation.

They request statements that the investigation, as well as their interrogation, arrest, accusation, and trial between April and October 1984 were unfounded and in violation of their constitutional rights.

He also requests a statement that any finding of wrongdoing contained in the 1985 report of the Court’s investigation into the Kerry Babies case is unfounded and incorrect and violates his constitutional rights.

The matter was briefly raised before Judge Leonie Reynolds in Superior Court this afternoon.

Liam Reidy SC for Ms. Hayes said the request was being made as part of ongoing discussions between the family and the state defendants.

If the statements are made by the court, then the defendants have agreed to prominently attach such orders to all copies of the 1985 Court of Investigation report, the court heard.

The judge granted the brothers’ attorneys permission to give short notice of motions in which the Hayes brothers request formal statements.

The matter will return to court next week.

Comments are closed for legal reasons.



[ad_2]