[ad_1]
An AFFECTED parent who wants to found a charity in his child’s name will not be able to publish it due to the court ruling on the identification of child victims of crime.
The man, who lost his son and two other children in tragic circumstances, has spoken of his “pain and anger” over the ruling, which effectively gags the parents in their situation so that they do not disclose their children in the media .
Article 252 of the 2001 Juvenile Law, which establishes mandatory and automatic reporting restrictions in the case of “any proceeding for an offense against a child”. In October, the appeals court ruled that these bans extend to children who have died or who have turned 18.
Talking to Independiente.esThe father of three, who also cannot be identified because it could lead to the identification of his children, said that all three had names and “I need to be able to shout their names from the rooftops,” he said. said.
He added: “I need to talk about (names removed for legal reasons) and I need to celebrate their too short lives. I just want the child victims to be named to help us heal. Part of that healing is the promises I made to (names removed for legal reasons). “
The man, who supports the current law amendment on the subject, said he hopes to continue his children’s legacy by establishing an annual snowman coloring competition as well as a charity to support small clubs. and companies, in their names.
“I could not do this without the support of the media and if we could not name (names removed for legal reasons),” he said. Independiente.es. “I never hope to be cured, but keeping these promises and celebrating them makes me that much less sad. I cannot describe the pain and anger I felt over the Appeals Court decision. “
The Court of Appeal recently ruled that a child who is dead cannot be identified when someone is accused of taking their own life. This ruling means that the person charged with such murder or manslaughter cannot be named if doing so would also reveal details of the youth.
The ruling also prevents adults who were abused as children from waiving their right to anonymity.
Speaking at RTÉ’s Today with Claire Byrne On yesterday’s show, Justice Minister Helen McEntee promised to move “as quickly as possible” on the ruling.
McEntee said she had heard a recent interview on the show with a woman who had been raped as a child.
The woman was interviewed anonymously and said she had been deprived of the ability to make a decision about revealing her identity due to the ruling.
The Court of Appeal ruled in a media appeal against the restrictions placed on the name of a girl and her mother.
The woman was found innocent for the folly of killing her three-year-old daughter.
In a separate case heard this week, involving ten people accused of illegally sharing the names or photos of the young killers of a teenage schoolgirl on social media, the DPP presented a walk-through presentation of the Court of Appeals ruling.
As a result, the young victim, who was named during the high-profile murder trial, can no longer be named.
Online editors
[ad_2]