Rebekah Vardy Says ‘Wagatha Christie’s’ Legal Battle With Coleen Rooney Could Be Resolved In The New Year | UK News



[ad_1]

Rebekah Vardy has hinted that there may soon be an end to the “Wagatha Christie” saga, saying she thinks the public is “fed up” with reading about her feud with Coleen Rooney.

The couple are involved in a legal battle after Ms. Rooney, the husband of footballer Wayne, suggested that Ms. Vardy was leaking information about her private life to the media.

Ms Vardy, who is married to Leicester City forward Jamie Vardy, denies the allegations and is suing for defamation.

Rebekah Vardy arrives at the National Ice Center in Nottingham for a Dancing On Ice 2021 training session while a High Court hearing takes place in London on her high-profile defamation battle against Coleen Rooney.
Image:
Rebekah Vardy Says There Could Be An End To The Case In The New Year

Talking to Hello! magazine said: “The new year could see a resolution between us.

“I’m pretty sure the public is sick of reading about it too.”

Mrs. Vardy last month won an initial victory in the case and their lawyers said they would seek nearly £ 23,000 in costs from Ms Rooney.

In October 2019, Ms Rooney wrote on social media about how information on her private Instagram account ended up in The Sun newspaper.

He said he had tried to find the alleged source by hiding his posts from everyone except one account.

Ms. Rooney ended the post with: “It’s ……………. Rebekah Vardy’s account.”

Coleen Rooney's spokesperson said the socialite is eager to hear what 'Rebekah has to say to the court'
Image:
Coleen Rooney made the allegations on her social media in October 2019.

Ms. Vardy’s attorney told the court that the posts were a “false and unwarranted defamatory attack” and that she had always denied any involvement.

Ms Rooney’s spokesperson said last month: “After three years of stress and anxiety over the leaks of her private social media account, Coleen is eager to see progress on the real issues, starting with what Rebekah has to tell her. to court”.

Following the judge’s ruling, the court heard that the women would make “one last attempt to resolve the matter without the need for a full trial.

[ad_2]