Which party’s voters will be more galvanized? It was a question that strategists on both sides were reluctant to guess, as they waited for data to come to the polls in the next few days from the battlefield states.
In Montana, for example, Democratic Challenge Gov. Steve Block will receive significantly more votes than his party’s presidential candidate, Joseph R. Biden Jr., if he has no hope of Republican-elected Senator Steve Dines. Mr. Trump carried 20 percent of the points to Montana four years ago.
Although Democrats were able to bring in money, some Rs servists questioned how effectively it could cost six weeks before the election – coming so late – when the advertising time was limited which could still be reserved on television and the rate of return was falling. Is.
“The number of really acceptable swing voters is very low,” said Ralph Reed, a top strategist at Christian Wright, which organizes voter turnout in states such as North Carolina and Iowa. He added, “Outpadings on TV are mostly shotgun on the head of the pin.” “Spraying a very low cost fire into a very small target.”
Mr. Shatz, Hawaii Senator, strongly disagreed.
“It’s a myth that this money can’t be used, or that every race is already saturated,” he said. “There are many Democratic Senate candidates who are short of money to get their message across, whether it’s direct mail, social media or radio.”
Some reactions have already been made to the ongoing liberal-donor dear Amy McGrath against Mr. McConnell. Despite racing in deep-red Kentucky, it raised 47 47 million by the end of June. In last week’s Quinnipiac poll, Ms. McGrath showed a 12-point drop, and some Democrats said the money donated to them would be better directed elsewhere.
Neither Mrs. McCagrath nor Mark Kelly, the top-funded Democratic candidate in Ari Rizona, were included in the Ku Kul media list. The McGraw and Kelly campaign did not disclose the basis for their weekly fundraising figures.
