Everyone loves Sadio Mane from Liverpool when the unfortunate fact of Virgil van Dijk comes up


Liverpool has been accumulating records during its remarkable Premier League season.

But lately they have been acquiring some benchmarks that they would rather not.

Such was the case in the Emirates on Wednesday, when Arsenal had the fewest shots of any winning team in a high-flying game since those records began in 2003.

It helped, of course, that Liverpool gifted the Gunners their two goals in the Londoners’ 2-1 victory.

He really was in the big smoke on qualifying duty and it wasn’t too difficult for him to point the finger at the reason for the loss.

Alisson Becker and Virgil van Dijk scored five after their individual errors, while there were plenty of 6s.

Joe Gómez received the man of the match award as the only player with 8, although in retrospect, the opinion on Sadio Mane was a bit harsh, as the Senegalese fell to 6 due to his lack when Liverpool looked for a draw in the second half.

Back up a 7 for you, Sadio. You will certainly be delighted with that news.

What they say

Of course, other qualifications are available. And the national media didn’t exactly have a difficult job determining who was to blame for Liverpool’s defeat.

the Mirror he thought Mane was better with 8 while Van Dijk had trouble with 4.

the Quick it gave Mane, Fabinho, Robertson and Gomez the best score of 7, while Salah and Alisson were the lowest with 5.

the Independent it gave Mane and Robertson the best scores with 8, while Wijnaldum, Van Dijk and Alisson scored 5.

Liverpool FC essential news

Making a guest appearance, Sky Sports Salah, Mane and Robertson led the way with 7. Alisson and Van Dijk were last with 4.

In the meantime, The times He considered Alexander-Arnold, Robertson, Fabinho and Mane the best with 7, while Alisson and Van Dijk got 4.

Finally, those who make numbers in WhoScored.com Best calculated with 8.06. The last were Van Dijk at 5.71 and Alisson at 4.86, his worst ratings in a Premier League game. Wow.

.