[ad_1]
SCOTUS is not involved here
Are Trump’s lawyers correct that SCOTUS will hear the Pennsylvania case? How likely is it??
-I don’t understand legal suffix
No, they are not. How are things now there is no possibility of the Supreme Court of the United States intervening in any of the cases.
For a case to reach the Supreme Court, it must first go through a series of state courts. So the Supreme Court must really decide whether or not it will hear the case (it can dismiss it). Once a case overcomes those two hurdles, THEN SCOTUS can get involved.
This is super simplified, but they tend to get involved only when there is a fairly important constitutional issue to resolve.
The problem with these Trump demands is that, according to the judges who have repeatedly rejected them, they have been poorly argued and not based on fact.
“Free and fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Accusations of injustice are serious. But calling an election unfair does not mean it is. The charges require specific charges and then evidence. We have neither,” he said Judge Steohanos Bibas in a ruling. .
“One might hope that by seeking such a surprising result, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with compelling legal arguments and factual evidence of rampant corruption, so that this Court would have no choice but to grant the proposed injunction despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens. That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with tense legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, without basis in the operative complaint and without evidentiary basis, “said Judge Matthew Brann in another .
So there is no need for the Supreme Court to get involved. There is no evidence of what the lawsuits allege, which means that there is no case to discuss in the lower courts, let alone in the highest court in the country.
