[ad_1]
OR
Rareart1, 12 minutes ago Your input here was helpful. I know a person with a laptop that contains an AMD chipset. The per … moreContradictory. Anyone with such complaints is a mindless fanatic and would have bought an Intel machine to begin with.
289146Shadocx, 1 hour agoWhere I live, ASUS, Acer and Lenovo are selling laptops with similar specs for € 780-800 and people … moreConsidering it’s a 1.1kg ultrabook, I think the price makes sense, but Comet Lake is the latest generation now, replaced by Tiger Lake. Sure, the makers still sell Comet Lake and Ice Lake, but they were released a long time ago. On the other hand, Tiger Lake is considerably more expensive than its predecessors. Still, I find it very strange to launch it with a state-of-the-art chip. If it is AMD, all manufacturers use the current generation.
?
- Anonymous
- PZa
It looks decent.
S20218
This competes directly with MSI Modern 14, both AMD and Ryzen versions. Although MSI is 7k cheaper.
Not forgetting that many providers offer much better for a much lower price.
R1480211
Russel, 38 minutes agoI see you’re back with your intelligence bootlicker. Intel held the gaming crown until amd … more Your input here was helpful. I know a person with a laptop that contains an AMD chipset. The person complains regularly, because he has an AMD chipset, and says that he would like to have a laptop with an Intel chipset. I will share your comment here with that person later today.
289146Andreidinutu, 1 hour agoBecause nobody but the players like amd. I’m fine with both, but office workers like … moreIf people don’t investigate, they will stay with Intel forever. People’s perception of AMD has changed dramatically after Ryzen, AMD has already eaten a significant chunk of Intel’s market and that doesn’t just include gamers. Many people doing demanding jobs know that AMD performs better, so it is not accurate to say only gamers like AMD. Intel CPUs are actually better than AMD for gaming, but that has changed with the launch of Zen 3. Integrated GPUs, AMD wins hands down, but now the gap is very small. Like the record players.
If it weren’t for AMD, who knows how long Intel will put two cores in laptops. Sure, that’s enough performance, but if there are hardly any improvements in each generation, why upgrade? Most people don’t realize that and end up wasting money. Now we can have a whopping eight cores in an ultrabook, doesn’t that sound good? And the ultrabooks are aimed at students and official workers. You can play games on it, but it’s not as good as gaming laptops.
GRAM147
AMD Ryzen 5 or 7 would have been great instead of Intel SoC
R
- Russel
- uuy
Andreidinutu, 1 hour agoBecause nobody but the players like amd. I’m fine with both, but office workers like … moreI see you’re back with your intelligence bootlicker.
Intel held the gaming crown until amd released Zen 3 and this happened very recently.
AMD has led all departments since Zen 2 and has been a leader in all multi-threaded applications since Zen 1.
Security? 235+ vulnerabilities in the last 18 months or so on Intel Core processors. (The combined total of vulnerabilities disclosed in amd, nvidia, ARM, VIA, etc. must be less than 50 in the same time period.) Many of the vulnerabilities in Intel cannot even be patched at the software level and those that can cause severe loss of performance.
Intel processors run hotter, are less efficient under load (but still more efficient when idle), and cost more (Intel tax).
Intel has brainwashed ignorant masses into thinking that the best processors are core i7 / i5, even if these ignoramuses don’t know that i7 is a brand that Intel uses (people still ask if a phone’s processor is faster than Intel). This is due to years of campaigns and publicity by Intel. It has nothing to do with actual performance.
The games have nothing to do with amd. In fact, amd processors are even more relevant for creating multithreaded content and applications.
And another thing here, as someone pointed out, is the fact that they use older Intel processors which are terrible in the gpu department, as opposed to the newer XE graphics which may rival a bit much older vega graphics.
You were the same person who commented that Intel has the best processors at the high end. This is not true either.
Intel fails everywhere except in the lower end ‘Atom’ space where they have no x86 competitors at the moment because amd no longer designs ‘cat’ cores. (And VIA is no longer relevant).
So stop fooling people.
GRAM
They should have released a version of RYZEN too …
289146Anonymous, 1 hour agobecause there is no amd driver support. And it is expensive to write your own controller. Manufacturer b … moreNo driver support for AMD? Are you sure this is relevant in the current time? AMD already offers mobile drivers directly from the desktop branch, so Ryzen mobile users no longer need to rely on the manufacturer. AMD has excellent driver support, even for GPUs as old as the 7000 series.
What do you mean by paying for R&D to use Ryzen? If they use Intel, don’t they need to pay Intel? Isn’t that business buying potato chips? If they pay for R&D, why is the AMD equivalent cheaper than Intel?
?
- Anonymous
- 7ki
Sorry I’ll use my fingers or my Cassio …
?
- Anonymous
- u1B
I’m not sure, who are your target buyers? Home users or corporate clients. The 14-inch IPS LCD screen indicates that it is designed for business professionals. Anyway, the price is really high for a normal home user.
Dell provides the licensed version of the latest version of MS Office along with the pre-installed OEM version of Windows 10. Why pay more money to buy MS Office separately?
S1429496
Where I live, ASUS, Acer and Lenovo are selling laptops with similar specifications for € 780-800 and people are complaining about the price.
Do you want a 50% discount on the launch?
1422222DrakeX, 1 hour agoSeriously, Intel? And it is an i5-10210U. There is already an i5-1135G7 with graphics … moreBecause nobody but the players like amd. I’m fine with both, but office workers like Intel because Intel is branded and I totally agree with that. Anyway it is more than enough cpu imo. It’s not a gamintg laptop, remember?
?
Anonymous, 1 hour agoAt this price I will go for an 11th gen processor … the price is very high compared to my laptopAt this point, it should be clear how expensive intelligence is
1422222Haha 800 dollars in India? Really? Who expects me to pay so much for an i5? Nobody. Not even here in Romania where we pay 800 for a celeron
990224How much hehehe dear oh dear! It’s a flipkart special.
re543244
Everything else is fine except the price.
?
DrakeX, 1 hour agoSeriously, Intel? And it is an i5-10210U. There is already an i5-1135G7 with graphics … morebecause there is no amd driver support. And it is expensive to write your own controller. The manufacturer basically has to pay per rnd to use ryzen. Why should the manufacturer use its resources if it does not provide enough support?
289146Seriously, Intel? And it is an i5-10210U. An i5-1135G7 already exists with graphics performance on par with the Vega 6. It costs a lot, too. The weight provides an advantage compared to the competition. I still don’t understand why manufacturers don’t make Ryzen ultralight laptops.
