A vaccine can provide better immunity than an infection, says an expert



[ad_1]

Interestingly, the two people had different results. The person in Hong Kong showed no symptoms in the second infection, while the person in Reno, Nevada, had a more severe version of the disease the second time. Therefore, it is not clear whether an immune response to SARS-CoV-2 will protect against subsequent reinfection.

Does this mean that a vaccine will not protect against the virus either? Certainly not. First, it is not yet clear how common these reinfections are. More importantly, a weakened immune response to natural infection,

Any infection initially triggers a non-specific innate immune response, in which white blood cells trigger inflammation. This may be enough to eliminate the virus. But in longer infections, the adaptive immune system kicks in. Here, T and B cells recognize distinct structures (or antigens) derived from the virus. T cells can detect and destroy infected cells, while B cells produce antibodies that neutralize the virus.

During a primary infection, that is, the first time a person is infected with a particular virus, this adaptive immune response is delayed. It takes a few days before the immune cells that recognize the specific pathogen are activated and expand to control the infection.

Some of these T and B cells, called memory cells, persist long after the infection resolves. It is these memory cells that are crucial for long-term protection. In a subsequent infection by the same virus, memory cells are rapidly activated and induce a robust and specific response to block the infection.

A vaccine mimics this primary infection, providing antigens that prime the adaptive immune system and generating memory cells that can be rapidly activated in the event of an actual infection. However, since the antigens in the vaccine are derived from weakened or non-infectious material of the virus, there is little risk of serious infection.

READ MORE: A man in Hong Kong caught Covid-19 twice. Here’s why that’s not surprising

Better immune response

Vaccines have other advantages over natural infections. For one thing, they can be designed to target the immune system against specific antigens that elicit better responses.

For example, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine elicits a stronger immune response than infection with the virus itself. One reason for this is that the vaccine contains high concentrations of a viral coat protein, more than would occur in a natural infection. This triggers strongly neutralizing antibodies, making the vaccine very effective in preventing infection.

Natural immunity against HPV is especially weak, as the virus uses various tactics to evade the host’s immune system. Many viruses, including HPV, have proteins that block the immune response or simply stay low to avoid detection. In fact, a vaccine that provides accessible antigens in the absence of these other proteins may allow us to control the response in a way that a natural infection does not.

READ MORE: Why youth should be prioritized for Covid-19 vaccines

The immunogenicity of a vaccine, that is, its effectiveness in eliciting an immune response, can also be adjusted. Agents called adjuvants generally activate the immune response and can enhance the immunogenicity of the vaccine.

Along with this, the dose and route of administration can be controlled to stimulate appropriate immune responses in the correct places. Traditionally, vaccines are given by injection into the muscle, including for respiratory viruses like measles. In this case, the vaccine generates such a strong response that antibodies and immune cells reach the mucosal surfaces of the nose.

However, the success of oral polio vaccine in reducing polio infection and transmission has been attributed to a localized immune response in the gut, where the poliovirus replicates. Similarly, giving the coronavirus vaccine directly to the nose can contribute to stronger mucosal immunity in the nose and lungs, offering protection at the site of entry.
READ MORE: Herd immunity won’t solve America’s Covid-19 problem

Understanding natural immunity is key

A good vaccine that enhances natural immunity requires that we first understand our natural immune response to the virus. So far, neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 have been detected up to four months after infection.
The conversation
Previous studies have suggested that antibodies to related coronaviruses typically last a couple of years. However, the decrease in antibody levels does not always translate into a weakening of immune responses. Even more promising, a recent study found that memory T cells triggered responses against the coronavirus that causes SARS nearly two decades after people were infected.
Of the roughly 320 vaccines being developed against Covid-19, one that favors a strong T-cell response may be the key to long-lasting immunity.

Maitreyi Shivkumar is Senior Lecturer in Molecular Biology at De Montfort University.

[ad_2]