Epic returns to court to demand that Apple restore Fortnite’s App Store listing



[ad_1]

On August 28 as warned, Apple closed the iOS and Mac developer accounts that belong to Epic Games. This move prevents Epic from offering updated versions of Fortnite and Unreal Engine to third-party software developers. Before that, Apple removed the popular game from the App Store. What caused this battle was Apple’s 30% “Tax”, the 30% cut in in-app purchases that Apple collects on purchases that run through its in-app payment system.

Knocked down once on the court, Epic Games tries again

The bottom line is that Apple will not allow a listed app to promote the developer’s payment system on the App Store. In other words, once an application is installed on an iPhone, only Apple’s integrated payment system can be offered. But Epic, like Spotify and others, see this as anticompetitive behavior on Apple’s part because iPhone users can only download apps from the App Store. So, Epic included a screen with the game that gave Fortnite users the option to pay through the App Store or through Epic’s direct payment system. Using the latter would save the buyer a couple of dollars.

But this violated the terms and conditions that Epic agreed to when signing with Apple for Fortnite to appear on the App Store. In an attempt to prevent Apple from taking action, Epic went to court seeking a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) that would prevent Apple from taking the threatened action against it. But the judge declined to do so, claiming that Epic could solve its own problem simply by removing the direct payment option from the game.

According to AppleInsider, late on Friday, in a filing filed with the US District Court for the Northern District of California, Oakland Division, Epic made its case against Apple while seeking an injunction against Apple. The 182-page document accuses Apple of committing antitrust violations by hacking Fortnite. Epic’s attorneys colorfully wrote that Apple “fiercely retaliated” by trying to remove Fortnite from the App Store and by shutting down Epic’s developer accounts.

In the filing, Epic wrote: “In summary, charged with antitrust violations for misusing its power to create and maintain two monopolies, Apple used that same power to attempt to coerce Epic to comply with its illegal restrictions. The Court it must not allow Apple to enforce these restrictions. “

As he wrote in the original presentation about two weeks ago, Epic says it is “likely to be successful on the merits” and notes that Apple’s rules give it a monopoly power to distribute iOS applications and process payments within the application. . Based on the legal document it filed last night, Epic believes it should be successful at heart because Apple has a monopoly on the iOS app distribution market, Apple illegally maintains a monopoly on the iOS app distribution market, Apple’s linking of the App Store and IAPand Apple’s linking unreasonably restricts commerce and illegally maintains its monopoly on the payment processing market in the iOS app. During the original court battle that took place last month, also over Zoom, United States District Judge Yvonne González Rogers did not bite Epic’s line that she is likely to succeed on the merits of the case. . She was also not convinced that Epic would take great harm by removing Fortnite from the App Store.

“Apple absolutely prohibits any competition in any of the markets, leaving Apple free to impose distribution and processing terms without the control of competitive forces,” says Epic. The game’s developer says it is not trying to force Apple to handle app distribution and in-app payments for free. Instead, you simply want the ability to “not use Apple’s App Store or IAP (in-app payment), and instead use and offer competitive services.”

A hearing via Zoom is scheduled for September 28.

[ad_2]