New documents have been unsafe in the bitter legal battle between Jeffrey Epstein prosecutors Virginia Giuffre and Harvard law professor Alan Dershowitz.
The hit relates, in part, to Dershowitz’s attempt to sue billionaire Les Wexner and deposit it for evidence in Giuffre’s counterattack.
The law professor hopes to show that Giuffre tried to export Wexner – the former head of the parent company Victoria Secret who has ties to pedophile multi-millionaire Jeffrey Epstein.
In a letter to Judge Loretta Preska requesting that Wexner be fired and forced to hand over documents about his relationship with Epstein and Giuffre, Dershowitz’s lawyer said it would be “important evidence at the trial.”
“The information found by Wexner goes to the heart of Professor Dershowitz’s case,” his lawyer wrote in a July 23 letter that was unsafe Monday.
Dershowitz also requests that Wexner’s attorney, John Zeiger, be fired and forced to provide documents related to Wexner’s relationship with Epstein’s defendants.
Wexner claims he has no knowledge he could share in a depot that makes Dershowitz’s claim that he was extinct by Giuffre, the documents show.
In a June 19 letter to Dershowtiz’s attorney, a lawyer told Wexner that he could not provide information “relevant” to the claim.
“We believe Mr. Wexner does not have any unbiased information relevant to a claim or defense regarding Mr. Dershowitz’s allegations of extortion,” the letter states.
“As for the remaining allegations in the trial, we believe that Mr. Wexner’s filing would place an unreasonable burden on him because his testimony would be irrelevant and / or disproportionate to the needs of the trial and , in fact, at best only inevitably is extensive, collateral evidence, ”it adds.
Lawyers for Guiffre wrote in a separate letter that they want the depositions to continue because they believe it will prove that Dershowitz falsely accused them of plotting the extortion.
The verdict came on the one-year anniversary of Epstein’s suicide pending trial.
.
