Threatened to close all Confucius Institutes in the United States and continue to repress Huawei Pompeo threatened to wage an “economic cold war” with 1.4 billion people_China



[ad_1]

Original title: Threatening to close all Confucius Institutes in the United States and continue to repress Huawei Pompeo threatened to wage an “economic cold war” with 1.4 billion people

Pompeo, who was just named the “worst secretary of state in history” by the US media, ranted again on September 1 local time, issuing two major threats: shutting down all Confucius Institutes in the United States. In 3 months; Take further action against Huawei. He also claimed that the United States is currently facing the economic challenge of a country with a population of 1.4 billion and a gross national product (GDP) growth rate of about 6%, and that it will fight an “economic cold war” with China.

Threatened to Close All Confucius Institutes at US Universities in 3 Months

After the US State Department announced in August this year that the Confucius Center at the America Institute was listed as a “foreign mission,” Pompeo revealed on September 1 the true purpose of this operation: I hope that the American universities close all Confucius Institutes before the end of this year.

On September 1 local time, when Pompeo was interviewed by Fox Business Channel, host Lou Dobbs asked, “According to the latest statistics, American colleges and universities and K-12 (a collective term for kindergarten, education US primary and secondary school) There are a total of 75 Confucius Institutes. How many will there be by the end of this year? “” I hope it is zero. ” Pompeo brazenly said, “I think everyone sees the risks associated with them … I hope we can Shut them all down by the end of this year.”

On August 13, Pompeo announced the registration of the Confucius Institute’s Central America as a “foreign mission,” falsely claiming that the Confucius Institute’s Central America was “an action entity that expanded global propaganda and the malicious influence of Beijing.” According to the “Foreign Missions Act” of the United States, organizations classified as “foreign missions” must report to the US Department of State of all personnel and register all properties that they own and rent under her. US State Department Under Secretary of State for East Asian Affairs David Starwell said at the time that only the Confucius Institute’s American Center in Washington, DC, was listed as a “foreign mission.” The Confucius Institute that currently operates on American university campuses will not be closed, but American universities will. The Confucius Institute’s activities on campus should be closely monitored.

Since the University of Maryland opened the first Confucius Institute in the United States in 2004, there have been more than 100 Confucius Institutes in the United States. The Confucius Institutes and Confucius Classrooms have long been important platforms for deepening the humanities exchanges between China and the United States. The US State Department has also expressed strong support for the Confucius Institutes to promote Chinese in the United States. However, after the Trump administration came to power in 2017, it began to “make a fuss” over the Confucius Institutes, defaming the Confucius Institutes, making American universities face the threat of espionage and theft of intellectual property, and pressuring universities to close the Confucius Institutes. In 2018, the US Department of Defense launched the so-called “Flagship Language Program” to provide funding to US universities to develop Chinese language education. In August of the same year, an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act passed by the United States Congress stipulated that the Department of Defense was prohibited from funding the Chinese flagship program of an American university with a Confucius Institute unless the university was exempt. This forces American universities to choose between the Confucius Institute and the Ministry of National Defense when they receive funding for Chinese educational programs.

The University of Oregon deputy director of Education, who was forced to close the Confucius Institute in 2019, once said that it is a painful choice between the Confucius Institute and the Department of Defense. On January 17 of this year, University of Maryland President Lu Daokui announced that after evaluating the impact of the National Defense Authorization Act on the University of Maryland, he decided to close the 16-year-old University of Maryland by end of the 2019-20 academic year. Confucius Institute. However, many universities have launched a “graceful counterattack” against the government ban. Private universities, including Webster University, are even more positively “hard bars” as they believe that the Confucius Institutes do not pose a purported risk to the security of the United States. As of December 2019, 88 Confucius Institutes in the United States are still operating normally.

“The request by the US federal government that universities close the Confucius Institutes is contrary to the academic freedom it has always defended,” Sun Chenghao, a scholar at the Institute of American Studies at the China Institute of Modern International Relations, told a reporter for the China Youth Daily and China Youth Daily on September 2. Over the years, the Confucius Institutes have undoubtedly diversified the culture and knowledge system of the American campus, which is also the priority of American universities. The United States government insisted on forcing some universities to close the Confucius Institutes. It did not take into account the interest and needs of American students and parents in language learning and understanding of Chinese culture, forcing students and parents to miss out on a good choice. “The possibility of establishing a Confucius Institute must be determined by the school has the last word.”

Threats to take further action against Chinese companies

In addition to hard-line pressure on university Confucius Institutes and other cultural exchange activities, Pompeo also threatened on September 1 that he would “participate” in the Chinese company Huawei in the near future and tried to explain the so-called “new cold war. ” in their own way.

In an interview with Fox Business Channel on September 1, host Lou Dobbs asked if Pompeo would defend while slandering Chinese companies for stealing American intellectual property. Pompeo immediately responded that restrictive measures against Chinese companies like Huawei are one of the counterattacks, and the US government may take further action. He said: “You will see broader action. I think that in the coming days and weeks we will see the United States address these problems in a very serious way, all for the economic benefit of the United States.” Pompeo also stated that many of America’s partners and allies also face “Chinese threats” and that they will cooperate with the United States.

When asked what he thought of the warning issued in August by Chinese State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi that “China and the United States should avoid entering a new Cold War,” Pompeo immediately stated that current relations between China and America are “compared to the Cold War state.” Something of relevance ”, but the reality is not the same. “Unlike the challenges of the Cold War, we are faced with a country with a population of 1.4 billion and an annual GDP growth rate of around 6%. The challenge is different, (China) is an economic challenge.” He also cried out: “President Trump will counter them on all fronts.”

When Pompeo visited the Czech Republic last month, he constantly incited new cold war economic sentiment, declaring that “what is happening right now is not Cold War 2.0 … China’s global economic strength makes it more difficult to deal with. with her in some way than the Soviet Union during the Cold War. “.

Since the beginning of this year, Pompeo has frequently made unsubstantiated accusations and malicious smears against China, exaggerated the so-called “threat from China”, deliberately created a confrontation between China and the United States, declared that US policy on China had “failed” in the past. past 50 years and instigated allies to join the “anti-China camp.” “But these styles of his can’t even stand up to the American media.” Washington Post “deputy commentary editor-in-chief Jackson Dyer posted a comment on August 31 on the topic” Pompeo is the worst secretary of state in America. history, “listing a series of absurd comments and stupid behaviors that Pompeo has made since taking office. He widely criticized his mistakes in domestic management and foreign policy, saying that Pompeo led US foreign policy to a dead end. “He is the worst secretary of state in the history of the United States, not one of them.”

China never wants to fight the “new cold war” with anyone

Pompeo and other American politicians rampant slander China, and the Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman has responded many times. Zhao Lijian clearly reminded Pompeo and his followers that blindly participating in anti-communist and anti-China political manipulation is unpopular and doomed to fail. The more you lie and cheat, the more people with judgment and a sense of justice will see your true face.

Regarding Pompeo’s continued hype about the “new cold war” and even the problems of the “economic cold war,” China’s State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi clearly pointed out in a speech at the Institute French International Relations on August 30 that a healthy and stable world should not only One or two countries have the last word. As a world power, the United States should adopt an inclusive attitude toward the development of other countries, and should also realize that people in other countries have the same right to live a good life as the American people. China has never wanted to fight a “new cold war” with anyone and in the age of globalization there can be no “cold war”. It is impossible to divide the world into two or three camps.

Our newspaper, Beijing, September 2

China Youth Daily · China Youth Daily Reporter Chen Xiaoru Source: China Youth DailyReturn to Sohu to see more

Editor:

Disclaimer: The opinions in this article only represent the author himself. Sohu is an information publishing platform. Sohu only provides storage space services.

[ad_2]