[ad_1]
Special activities for the largest inspection deployment——
Carry out legal assistance services for rural revitalization.
Our reporter Zhang Cong
“People’s Daily” (10th edition on February 25, 2021)
A few days ago, the Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office decided to carry out in depth the special activities of “Legal Assistance to consolidate and expand the alleviation of poverty and promote rural revitalization” in the fiscal organs of the entire country from February of this year to February 2023. The five categories of Poor clients in rural areas, including those returned to poverty and those living in difficulties related to lawsuits and petitioners, have increased legal assistance.
In recent years, the organs of the prosecution at all levels have implemented the deployment requirements of the Party Central Committee for the precise alleviation of poverty, they have actively integrated their work into the great practice of consolidating and expanding the results of the poverty alleviation and promoting rural revitalization, and have contributed with the wisdom and strength of the prosecution in the comprehensive implementation of the rural revitalization strategy.
Zhang Moumou is an employee of a certain unit engaged in security work. In 2010, when he dismantled the drinking water fountain in the guard room, he fell due to inadequate force and injured his chest. He was diagnosed that “the esophagus ruptured and entered the left thoracic cavity, pleural effusion on the right side.”
In 2011, Zhang XX applied to the local Office of Human Resources and Social Security for recognition of work injuries, but the Office of Human Resources and Social Affairs made a “Determination not to accept the Request for Determination of Work Injuries” on the basis that Zhang XX exceeded the deadline for the application for recognition of occupational accidents. Subsequently, Zhang XX requested an administrative reconsideration and filed an administrative complaint, but both were rejected. Zhang XX requested supervision from the prosecution body due to his dissatisfaction with the court decision.
After accepting Zhang’s request for supervision, the prosecution body, through a thorough investigation and verification of the relevant circumstances, found that Zhang’s request for a determination of work injury had indeed exceeded the time limit established by the law. According to the relevant regulations, the Office of Human Resources and Social Security Bureau made the decision not to accept it in accordance with the law. There is nothing wrong with not supporting their demands.
“There is no obvious irregularity in administrative trials and administrative actions, but those who are ‘poverty due to a case or returning to poverty due to case’ should actively coordinate legal assistance,” said Yang Chunlei, deputy prosecutor of the Supreme Public Prosecutor’s Office. . In this case, the prosecution considered that Zhang’s family is a low-income household, and their substantive claims are legitimate and reasonable, but are difficult to resolve through legal channels and are in line with the conditions of national legal assistance. Therefore, the prosecution body provided Zhang with legal assistance while making the decision not to support the request for supervision in accordance with the law.
“The prosecution body requested legal assistance for this, which not only resolved the administrative disputes, but also passed the temperature of the prosecution,” Yang Chunlei said.
Social assistance and subsistence allowances are essential to win the battle against poverty. However, some people have been marked with the “misconception” of illegally enjoying subsistence allowances and other policies. To this end, many organs of the local prosecutor’s office ensure the application of specific poverty alleviation policies by urging the relevant departments to carry out their functions in accordance with the law.
Guyuan County, Hebei Province, was once a poverty-stricken county nationwide. The county prosecutor’s office found in its duties that the municipality of Xixinying was not performing its functions properly in the implementation of the national policies of social assistance and support for the poor. After the case was shelved and investigated by the Guyuan County Prosecutor’s Office, it was discovered through inquiries and visits that the family financial status of some applicants was not true, and the municipality government did not strictly conduct household surveys, visits to neighborhoods, verification of family financial status, democratic review, and announcement of results during verification work Waiting for the program.
On June 20, 2020, the Guyuan County Prosecutor’s Office publicly announced the delivery of a prosecution proposal to the Xixinying Municipality government, suggesting that relevant personnel who have enjoyed welfare coverage and supportive policies should be reviewed. for the poor, and that application approval procedures should be reviewed. Be strictly implemented, Fully verify the applicant’s family economic situation; For residents who do not meet the conditions of the policy and who are in the period of gradual retirement of the poor, distinguish between different situations, and implement the reimbursement and insurance policy.
After receiving the suggestion from the prosecution, the Xixinying municipality government attached great importance to it, initiated reforms, re-examined 1819 households in 23 villages of the municipality that had already enjoyed the policy, canceled 3 households that did not meet the requirements of the policy, and cared for 13 households Families in a period of gradual poverty have improved their files and implemented dynamic management.
At present, public interest litigation of the prosecution is being actively integrated into the strategy of service to rural revitalization. In the first 11 months of 2020, prosecutorial bodies across the country focused on “three rural areas” issues, filed 29,249 public interest litigation, and issued pre-litigation prosecution recommendations or civil interest litigation announcement. public 22015 There were 137 public interest administrative lawsuits and 646 public interest civil lawsuits (including criminal and incidental civil public interest lawsuits) were filed to assist rural governance with tangible results in case management.
