[ad_1]
The two parties in the United States Congress proposed a bill that would abolish the legal protection of Article 230 for companies that “perform certain manipulations”, but in fact, it would deprive the United States of almost all Internet sites that interact with the users.Article 230 of the “Decent Communication Law” stipulates that online platforms can be exempted from liability for content posted by others on their websites. These safeguards allowed the first platforms to flourish, but they have attracted the attention of lawmakers and regulators.
access:
[活动]Alibaba Cloud “End of the Year Ceremony for Enterprise Feitian Members”: New Users Can Get Up to 1212 Yuan Red Envelope
Taobao Double 12 Super Red Envelope Receiving Entry: up to 3 times a day, up to 1212 yuan
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-HI) and Rep. Paul Gosar (R-AZ) proposed the “Great Tech Breakdown Act of 2020” on Wednesday to deprive businesses of this umbrella. Implementation, if they take so-called actions like “act as publisher and censor certain users”, they will be regulated.
Both Senator Gabbard and Senator Gosar position the bill as a way to avoid the so-called censorship of users and opinions. There are also some elements in the bill to curb the marketing of advertising and user data. “This bill removes impunity for service providers to benefit from statutory immunity, while retaining Section 230 protections for those who provide truly neutral search engine or social media platforms without using tampering algorithms. “Gabbard said. .
More specifically, the legislation will remove Article 230 protection for Internet companies that carry out the following activities:
Sell and display targeted advertising without user consent.
Collect data for “commercial purposes other than the direct sale of interactive computer services.”
“Know the real state of the platform” by introducing elements in the flow of commercial information.
The purpose of adopting digital products is to allow users to “participate and enjoy” the service.
As an editor, use algorithms to control or review content without user choice.
The scope of the proposal is wide enough, so the restriction applies to any place that publishes ads, even if it is a transaction from Google’s online advertising market, it is not directly commissioned, and there are also comment areas or other ways for users to post to the site. The content responds to or is shared by other users.
In recent years, Article 230 has become a political target. For example, Republicans believe that social media companies are censoring conservative views, while Democrats believe that when social media companies spread misinformation or misleading content, Section 230 will protect them. In practice, with the introduction of the Section 230 reforms, various venues will exercise more restraint to ensure they are still within the statutory protection scope of the regulations.
As early as October, the president of the Federal Communications Commission, Ajit Pai, declared that the Federal Communications Commission is capable of interpreting the law and that it plans to do so. In September, the Justice Department outlined legislation that will change certain Section 230 protections.
President Donald Trump signed an executive order in early 2020 because Twitter marked one of his tweets as misleading. During the campaign, President-elect Joe Biden also declared that he supported repealing the law.
Facebook’s Mark Zuckerberg, Google’s Sundar Pichai (Sundar Pichai), and Twitter’s Jack Dorsey all testified before Congress in early 2020, marking the 230th. Article and defense of allegations filed by the censorship system. Criticism of the protection measures also emerged at the antitrust hearing that was supposed to be held in July.
