[ad_1]
It is reported that the “Code of Teaching Ethics” collects and records the ethical performance of teachers in real time, including records of positive praise and negative records. According to the ethics of the teacher, it is divided into green, yellow and red: the green code represents the good ethics of the teacher; the yellow code represents criticism, education, reprimand, inspection and notification of criticism; the red code represents the warning, demerit or decrease in the level of work OR dismissal or expulsion.
In addition, all teachers in general primary and secondary schools (kindergartens), vocational secondary schools, special education schools, as well as teacher training for teaching and research, audiovisual education and other institutions (including teachers of schools Wenzhou private companies will have exclusive big data containing the health and personal ethics of teachers. QR code and generate the teacher’s moral health report.
According to the green, yellow and red identification results, it will be used as a “passport” for the evaluation of the professional title of teachers, recommendation and evaluation, recognition and rewards, request for scientific research and talent projects, teacher induction and exchanges.
The document reported that the Wenzhou City Education Bureau will also connect with the Wenzhou City public credit platform to incorporate the ethics of teachers into the integrity of the Wenzhou “Oujiang subsystem”. At the same time, it will also establish a real-time dynamic of teacher ethics based on big data on the “Teacher Code of Ethics.” Figure.
This action by the authorities provoked questions and criticism from netizens on the mainland, “Please respect personal privacy.” “The pressure on the teacher is already great, this approach is too much!” “Overcorrected”. “It is as dangerous as the code of civilization proposed by Suzhou in the previous paragraph. Abuse of power, ignorance of basic human rights and blasphemy of the group of teachers.” “Various codes are rampant in the world, it is mistrust in people and also reflects the chaotic order of local management. “” Big data abuse, various scoring systems Keep an eye on the people. “
Some netizens said, “The most important thing is to publish an official or public official ethics book to record violations of laws and disciplines or other unethical behavior by officials and their families as indicators of adjustment and promotion.” “All officials must have an official code of ethics, and they are the best Supervised Person.”
In addition to the “Ouyue Teacher’s Moral Code”, the “Health Code” and “Civilization Code” introduced by the Chinese Communist Party have caused great controversy. Mainland Chinese netizens believe that the introduction of these “XX codes” may cause concerns about people’s privacy and the security of personal information, and may also lead to discrimination.
The CCP authorities issued a notice in 2014, basically planning to establish a social credit system on rewards and punishments by 2020. This system is closely related to a large-scale monitoring system and uses facial recognition technology and big analysis technology. data, and even applies Emotion recognition technology monitors people.
Editor in Charge: Xu Menger
