[ad_1]
The United States signed the “Paris Climate Agreement” in 2015, which entered into force in the United States on November 4, 2016. President Trump announced shortly after taking office on June 1, 2017 that the United States would withdraw from the agreement. . However, according to regulations, if the United States as a contracting party wishes to withdraw, it must do so three years after the agreement takes effect. Therefore, the United States officially announced its withdrawal from this agreement on November 4 of this year, becoming the first country in the world to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement.
Trump said in a video released by the G20 summit: “To protect American workers, I decided that the United States will withdraw from this unfair and unilateral ‘Paris Climate Agreement’. The ‘Paris Climate Agreement’ is not meant to save It’s made for the environment, but to stifle the US economy, I refuse to lose millions of US jobs over this deal and send trillions of dollars to the worst countries that pollute the environment and that They commit environmental crimes. This will happen if we don’t quit. “
President Trump also presented the United States’ achievements since withdrawing from the “Paris Climate Agreement.” He said that the United States has reduced its carbon dioxide emissions below any country or region on the planet; the air in America is cleaner than it was before you took office. 7%; the US government’s environmental protection policy has enabled the US to achieve self-sufficiency in energy supply; And through the most powerful tax cut and rule reduction policy in US history, the US is now the world’s largest producer of oil and natural gas.
During his tenure, Trump has been promoting the development of the American oil industry and questioned the so-called consensus on global warming. The Trump administration’s energy policy has been well received by the American people. In the process of electing President Trump in 2020, many voters said that President Trump has made the American energy industry self-sufficient, which makes them very happy. They believe this is a great achievement of the Trump administration.
The shadow of communism behind the “global warming consensus”
The editorial department of The Epoch Times “Nine Comments” published in the book “The Devil Rules Our World” in 2018, said that current environmentalism has a distinctive communist color behind it, and the so-called “consensus on global warming” is unscientific. .
The book quotes the late former Soviet Union expert Natalie Grant Wraga as saying: “Environmental protection has become the main tool (of the former Soviet Union) for attacking Western countries. (The former Soviet Union) can use the pretext of protecting the environment to demand Western countries The implementation of a series of measures to destroy the industrial base of developed countries can also achieve its purpose of altering the situation by requiring Western developed countries to lower their standards of living and introduce communist values. “
American Academy of Sciences academic and former MIT science professor Richard Lindzen and former US Department of Energy, former New York University Under Secretary for Energy Steven Koonin, also expressed their consensus on the called climate warming. There is no conclusion yet. “
The book “The Devil Rules Our World” notes: “However, the communism behind this consensus on global warming is trying to amplify awareness of human disasters, mutate human values and control human beings, and ultimately establish The super-government that transcends each government to promote its communist theory and deprive human beings of freedom and dignity; and use this theory to repress and exclude independent-thinking scholars who do not support this concept: dissidents. “
Due to the pressure, Joanne Simpson, a fellow of the American Academy of Engineering and a prominent former NASA atmospheric scientist, only publicly expressed her doubts about the so-called “global warming consensus” dogma after her retirement. She said at the time: “Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization and have not received any funding, I can now frankly say that as a scientist, I am skeptical.”
