Johnson advocates partial overthrow of the Brexit deal, sparking opposition in the party

Original title: Johnson Calls for Partial Overthrow of Brexit Agreement Stirs Party Opposition

According to a Reuters report in London on September 14, British Prime Minister Johnson won preliminary support for a plan to partially overthrow the Brexit deal on the 14th. He also criticized the European Union, saying the motive for the aforementioned action was because the European Union refused to take the “revolver” from the negotiating table.

According to the report, Johnson won the so-called second-reading vote on the domestic market bill by 340 votes to 263 votes. A destructive amendment was rejected not long ago, but as Johnson faces more and more defections within the party, more amendments will follow.

The European Union says Johnson’s bill will collapse trade negotiations and push Britain into a chaotic Brexit. The former British leader warned that the breach of the Brexit deal was too excessive and undermined the British image.

Johnson said, however, it is vital to deal with “ridiculous” threats from Brussels, threats that include the establishment of trade barriers and food blockades between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK, which, he said, endangers the UK unit.

Johnson told Parliament before the vote: “The EU has not yet taken this revolver from the negotiating table. We cannot tolerate a situation where our EU counterparts believe they are capable of dividing our country.”

According to the report, the European Union requires the UK to repeal the main part of the Internal Market Act by the end of September. If it is not followed, you will not be able to reach a trade agreement covering everything from auto parts to food before the end of the year.

A source told Reuters that to strengthen its voice, the European Commission postponed the next key decision to allow London to continue providing euro clearing services to EU clients.

Johnson made it clear that he will continue to promote the bill he called defensive insurance policy, which aims to use Northern Ireland as a bargaining chip to prevent foreign forces from dividing the UK.

However, many parliamentarians are concerned about this flagrant violation of international law. All five living British prime ministers expressed concern about his plan.

Johnson said: “I understand why some people are upset about using these powers, and I feel the same way. They are an insurance policy, and if we come to terms with our European friends, I still think it is possible.” ——Then they will never be used. “

However, some EU diplomats believe that London is playing a “cowardly game”, using the breakdown of trade negotiations as a bargaining chip to reach the deal it wants or leave the EU without a deal.

Now that the bill has passed its second reading, members will discuss the details of the bill in the next four days; at this stage, members can try to add amendments that may change the entire meaning of the bill or even stifle it.

The main battlefield may be a proposal from Conservative Party member Bob Neal. He tried to modify the bill to ensure that any attempt to exploit the terms of the Brexit deal must be approved in advance by Parliament.

Disclaimer: This article is reproduced for the purpose of conveying more information. If there is an error in the font labeling or a violation of your legal rights, please contact the website with a certificate of ownership and we will correct and remove it in time, thank you.