Hong Kong Public Opinion and All Sectors of Society – Britain’s Huge Interference in China’s Internal Affairs and the BNO Publicity Hype is Actually Ruining Hong Kong_ 香港人



[ad_1]

Original Title: Hong Kong Public Opinion and All Sectors of Society – Britain’s Brutal Interference in China’s Internal Affairs and BNO Publicity Hype is Actually Ruining Hong Kong

Xinhua News Agency, Hong Kong, Jan.30. In response to the British National (Overseas) Visa and Passport (BNO) policy recently announced by the British government, public opinion in Hong Kong and all walks of life believe that the British government unilaterally changed the consensus between China and Britain on the BNO, which is a betrayal. The crude interference in China’s internal affairs is intended to ruin Hong Kong and seriously violate international law and the basic norms of international relations. It is natural for China to resolutely oppose and countermeasures.

Hong Kong’s “Wen Wei Po” editorial on the 30th noted that the British side used the status of some Hong Kong people who still had BNO passports to advertise political advertising as an excuse to provide Hong Kong people with a new path. for residence and naturalization in the United Kingdom. The essence is to ruin Hong Kong. Britain unilaterally changed the two countries’ consensus on BNO, treacherously and grossly interfered in Hong Kong’s internal affairs. It is natural for China to resolutely oppose it and take countermeasures. The UK uses politics to play justice in an attempt to defraud the wealth of the people of Hong Kong. Hong Kong people should keep their eyes open and not be considered “second-class citizens”.

“Hong Kong Commercial Daily” posted a comment that it is not difficult for everyone to see the nature of what is at stake behind BNO. The UK has witnessed Hong Kong’s development after its return, and the assets and incomes of the Hong Kong people are much better than before. In fact, he has relaunched the plan for the people of Hong Kong to relocate to Britain. The so-called “5 + 1” plan requires immigrants to contribute to the local economy and taxes for a few years before allowing them to apply for settlement and naturalization. If the UK is really good for Hong Kong people, why not give a British passport right away?

Ming Pao’s editorial on the 30th also noted that the UK described the “BNO Immigration Program” as helping the people of Hong Kong. Regardless of the selfishness and political calculations behind it, the plan itself will inevitably have a divergent effect on Hong Kong. This operation by the British side obviously violated its promise. The Chinese side retaliated tooth and nail and no longer recognized BNO as a travel document. I think it is just the first step in countermeasures.

“Sing Tao Daily” ran an editorial saying that the British blatantly playing the BNO card this time not only betrayed international integrity, but also used this to attack China and seize the opportunity for profit, which is obvious. Of course, the central government has an idea of ​​its intentions and will inevitably defend itself. Not admitting BNO as a travel document is only the first countermeasure. Britain’s betrayal and violation of international agreements come first, and China’s countermeasures are in full accord with law and reason.

Liang Zhenying, vice chairman of the National Committee of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, said via social media that the British were “assuming their own guilt” and “assuming their own humiliation.” He criticized the British government’s desire to allow China to accept BNO’s “5 + 1” immigration plan as an illusion, and the Chinese government would “then control others.” Tan Yaozong, a member of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress, criticized Britain’s betrayal and the violation of the Sino-British agreement. It is natural for China to oppose the system. Liu Zhaojia, vice president of the Hong Kong and Macau National Research Association, said the latest “5 + 1” policy in the UK violates the China-Britain agreement.Return to Sohu to see more

Editor:

Disclaimer: The opinions in this article only represent the author himself. Sohu is an information publishing platform. Sohu only provides storage space services.

[ad_2]