[ad_1]
Original title: Focus on inspection and acceptance of false sword fingers, false achievements and strict discipline to ensure the true results of poverty reduction.
Source: Website of the Central Commission for Disciplinary Inspection and the State Supervision Commission
Jiang Ganliang, Village Committee Director of Zhuhe Village, Mingyue Town, Huaying City, Sichuan Province, received a warning from the party for his ineffective performance in poverty alleviation projects such as scenic drive trails and roads. basic to industrial development.As the person in charge of the local poverty alleviation project, Jiang Ganliang knew that the road was not strong enough and the cement label did not meet the standards, but he only verbally told the part of construction to make corrections and treated it superficially during the acceptance evaluation, which resulted in the benefit.The village livelihood project for more than 7,000 people has become a “cold heart” project.
Recently the whole countryAll 832 impoverished counties rose out of poverty. However, according to recent reports from various localities, fraudulent practices and lax controls still existed in previous poverty alleviation inspections. Formal bureaucratic problems in the field of poverty alleviation cannot be ignored.
Some were not strict and careful in the acceptance work, resulting in projects that did not meet the standards that passed the audit.For example, when the Water Conservation Office of Zhangwu County, Liaoning Province, verified and accepted the county’s drinking water safety project only made a drinking water safety decision based on the test results issued by a third-party testing agency.The conclusion was 100% rated and the “Self-Assessment Report on Getting Out of Safe Drinking Water in Poor Counties” was produced.
To cope with the acceptance inspection, some fabricated and falsified when reporting data. For example, Chen Yue, former deputy director of Cengong County and director of the Ecological Immigration Bureau, was responsible for poverty alleviation and relocation, knowing that actual relocation households and the number of relocations only represented the total plan.24.24% and 26.17%, when reporting data, functional departments still need to report according to the completion rate of the construction of the main body of the house 100%.
Others are deformed and out of shape when implementing the acceptance review policy, and even pass the acceptance by compiling the results.For example, when Liu Xiaofeng, former secretary of the Party Committee of Sanguanmiao City, Lantian County, Xi City ‘an, Shaanxi Province, supervised and inspected the relocation and relocation work of old houses to alleviate poverty, gave instructions to replace the old houses of others to complete the demolition task.The 11 relocated homes used the way to replace or buy other people’s homes to counterfeit and replace the demolition, and the old home was not completely removed.
In addition, some base tables reported that the content of the poverty alleviation acceptance assessment was too complicated, the form requirements were too many, and the complicated data forms and data ledger tired the poverty alleviation tables. poverty.The question of “material poverty alleviation” is on the rise.
The reason why some party members and cadres misrepresented their acceptance of poverty alleviation stems from the dislocation of their political achievements. Faced with the arduous task of alleviating poverty, I generally don’t want to work hard and superficially. When it comes to the assessment and acceptance juncture, I want to get ahead by fabricating data and designing inspection routes.
“Insufficient ideological understanding, insufficient understanding of the urgency and arduous of relocation work for poverty alleviation and relocation. After discovering that the project construction was lagging behind, we could not find an effective way to break the neck of bottle in time … “During the review and investigation, Chen Yue promoted himself The main reasons for poor construction of the relocation project for poverty alleviation and relocation were reviewed, and finally they were severely warned by the party and removed from their positions as deputy county director and director of the Bureau of Ecological Immigration.
On the other hand, a small number of higher-level departments do not have a deep understanding of the real situation of people in need during the inspection and acceptance of poverty alleviation. Instead, they are used to handing out materials, looking at display boards, and listening to reports. To some extent, they have also contributed to the unhealthy trend of digital poverty alleviation and material poverty alleviation at the grassroots level.The “classic route” looked at the “fake bonsai”, and the temporary construction scenes and numbers fabricated by fake reports were still accepted as actual work results.
The Fourth Plenary Session of the XIX Central Commission for Discipline Inspection clearly requested that formalism, bureaucracy and other issues in the fight against poverty be precisely addressed. Since the beginning of this year, the supervisory and disciplinary supervisory bodies at all levels have continued to implement special measures against corruption and the style of work in the field of poverty alleviation, preventing and decisively rectifying problems such as laxity and fraud. , to ensure that poverty alleviation is true, reliable and up to the mark. Until now, issues of corruption and working style in the field of poverty alleviation have been investigated and addressedMore than 250,000, serving more than 350,000 people.
To rectify the formalism and bureaucracy in accepting poverty alleviation, it is necessary to seriously research and address it, but also to improve the evaluation method, strive to reduce false work and reduce the burden on the grassroots. The hard-earned results in poverty alleviation have not been easy. After gnawing on this tough bone, they will immediately face the new tasks and new requirements of continuing to promote the development of poverty alleviation areas and effectively link rural revitalization. The enforcement and disciplinary oversight agencies should continue to monitor the implementation of policies and follow-up measures for poverty alleviation, seriously rectify fraud, neglect and other problems, in order to provide a solid guarantee for the consolidation and continued expansion of the results of poverty alleviation.
