[ad_1]
The data analyst wrote in a report published on Thursday (December 17): “Analysis of the evidence shows that the ballot marking device Dominion x (Ballot Marking Device) manufactured by Dominion Voting Systems is used. / Las vote counting machines from ICX BMD and HARTInterCivic have an abnormal effect on election results. “
According to personal data retrieved by The Epoch Times, this data analyst who chose to remain anonymous for security reasons has 30 years of experience in data analysis.
In his research, he used voting data and census data from 2017 to establish a baseline scenario for predicting election results. He then used this baseline scenario model to compare the results of the November elections.
The results showed that among the counties that used the two companies’ voting machines, Biden’s approval rate exceeded the projected line by 78%.
His analysis also showed that Biden’s votes in these counties were 5.6% more than he should have received.
The expert said in a video presenting the results of his investigation: “This shouldn’t happen … In counties where Dominion voting machines are used, (Biden’s voting rate) is obviously too high. In my opinion This is a compelling red flag … Something is wrong here. “
He said that the model “(Add Biden) 5.6%” is not because the powerful counties and cities of the Democratic Party have used the previous voting machines extensively, because it can also be used by those who strongly support Trump (Tron) used by previous voting machines. P) Found in President’s Counties.
The results of this study have not been peer reviewed.
HARTInterCivic did not immediately respond to “The Epoch Times” request for comment. Dominion Voting Systems declined to comment on the results of the analysis. The company said: “The United States courts have repeatedly confirmed that there is no credible evidence that any voting process using the Dominion voting system has vote conversion or fraud.
The analysis report indicated that it did not draw any conclusions about who was violating the regulations.
However, he pointed out that if the possible violations shown in his analysis were caused by deliberate activities, then there must be a large conspiracy.
He said: “I see that the model is spread over many counties and cities. Therefore, the results of my research show that this fraud should be operated by a large organization with national influence. In other words, what we have seen, is not only one local scan operator who scans a voting box in the system three times. “
He did not specifically accuse any company or related party of illegal acts.
Editor in charge: Hua Ziming #
