[ad_1]
Source caption: A man in Haikou who lied about selling a house to defraud a friend for 132,500 yuan was sentenced to 3 years and 6 months and fined 30,000 yuan.
On November 24, the Haikou City Longhua District Court announced a case in which Wang, a man, invented various reasons to defraud his friend Pan out of a total of RMB 132,500 for selling a house. Recently, the court convicted Wang of fraud. Certain was sentenced to three years and six months in prison and fined 30,000 yuan.
In May 2017, Wang lied to Pan by telling him that he had a house in a community in Longhua District, Haikou City, that could be sold to Pan. Pan just wanted to buy a house in this area, and he believed it to be true, saying that he wanted to buy Wang’s house. Soon, Wang lied to Pan that he wanted to give a friend 5,000 yuan to take over the house as a thank you, and asked Pan to transfer 5,000 yuan to him first, and Pan He used mobile banking to transfer 5,000 yuan to Wang. After that, Wang asked Pan for various reasons. From May 2017 to December 2017, according to Wang’s request, Pan paid Wang a total of 102,500 yuan by wire transfer and paid Wang 30,000 yuan in cash. During this period, Pan paid When Wang was asked several times about the house, Wang used various reasons to delay and deceive Pan. After that, Wang did not respond to Pan’s call. On January 10, 2020, the Police captured Wang in Ding’an County, Hainan Province.
The Haikou City Longhua District Court held that defendant Wang ignored national laws and used fictitious factual methods and concealed the truth for the purpose of illegal possession, defrauding others for a total of RMB 132,500, which was a huge amount, and his behavior constituted a fraud. The crime must be punished. Defendant Wang voluntarily pleaded guilty and pleaded guilty after coming to the case, sincerely confessed to his crimes, and may receive lighter punishment in accordance with the law. According to the facts, the nature, the circumstances of the crime of the accused Wang and the degree of social harm of his actions, in accordance with article 266, article 67 paragraph 3 and article 52 of the Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China De In accordance with article 64, the court issued the above-mentioned judgment in accordance with the law. (Wang Tianyu, Mao Yujia, Cai Li)
