[ad_1]
Evaluation affects people’s hearts and refers to the direction of development. The way to evaluate the results of the “Double First Class” construction is highly anticipated by the education sector and all sectors of society. Recently, the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Finance and the National Development and Reform Commission jointly issued the “Measures for the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Construction” Double First Class (Test) “(hereinafter, the” Evaluation Measures “), clarifying that the total score is not counted and the classification is not included.
The “Evaluation Method” indicates that the evaluation of the effectiveness of the “double first class” construction is a multidimensional evaluation of the fulfillment of university functions, development of connotations and characteristic development of universities and their disciplinary construction, presenting in a Integrate the results. of university self-evaluation, expert evaluation and evaluation by third parties. The effectiveness evaluation adheres to the combination of level evaluation and benefit evaluation, and the combination of quantitative evaluation and qualitative evaluation. The evaluation results are presented comprehensively in the form of intervals and gradient distributions in different dimensions and different types, which is a “diagnostic report”.
Qu Zhenyuan, a member of the National Education Advisory Committee and former chairman of the China Higher Education Association, said that this diagnostic assessment can better comprehensively present the results of university self-assessment, dynamic monitoring assessment, assessment of experts and third party evaluation. , and aims to guide colleges and universities The discipline insists on unwavering goal-oriented and problem-oriented development and construction in a realistic way.
According to the “Evaluation Measures”, the effectiveness evaluation comprehensively covers the “five main construction tasks” and the “five main renovation tasks” of the “double first class” construction plan, and integrates them rationally to form a “front dimension and six main aspects”. Evaluation module.
A frontal dimension is the evaluation of the “strengthening of the effectiveness of the reform of the system of government and leadership of the party”, which is a forceful and decisive evaluation of the general construction of the university and the construction of the discipline that adheres to the essential requirements of Chinese characteristics. The six main aspects are the evaluation of the overall constructive effectiveness of “talent training, scientific research, social services, cultural heritage and innovation, international exchanges and cooperation, and training of teaching teams.” The evaluation of the disciplinary construction is carried out in four aspects: talent training, scientific research, social services and training of teaching teams. Among them, talent training includes undergraduate training and postgraduate training, highlighting the “double first class” construction of a comprehensive and high-quality talent training system in colleges and universities, and the cultivation of talents. first class; scientific research includes the natural sciences, humanities and social sciences, and natural sciences and humanities and social sciences. Cross-scientific integration emphasizes the production of first-class results and addresses national strategic needs.
Qu Zhenyuan introduced that an important innovation in the “Evaluation Measures” is to establish a three-dimensional evaluation angle of “general development level, degree of growth improvement and sustainable development capacity”, which not only attaches importance to the evaluation of the level current. , but also attaches importance to growth The assessment of characteristic development also attaches importance to the assessment of long-term development potential, in order to guide the healthy and sustainable development of universities and disciplines.
Zhong Binglin, a member of the State Council Committee on Academic Degrees and a professor at Beijing Normal University, said “Double First Class” construction is a complex engineering system and a long-term dynamic construction process. Achievement of the “double top tier” construction goal is not dependent on the school’s administrative “announcement” or self “declaration,” nor on the breadth of student size and disciplinary structure. The key is to stimulate endogenous school motivation and focus on building connotations. The quality of the talent training, the superior discipline and the level of professional construction and the reputation of the school have been widely recognized by the international academic community and society. The “double first-class” construction emphasizes dynamic fit, adheres to the rolling competition value orientation, survival of the fittest and continuous improvement, helping to avoid the phenomenon of identity solidification and “labeling “that occurred during the implementation of previous Construction Projects.
The head of the Department of Management of Undergraduate and Graduate Education of the Ministry of Education emphasized that the results of the self-evaluation, the expert evaluation and the evaluation by third parties of the universities, or the results of the comprehensive evaluation, are not the judgment of whether a university or discipline is built on a higher level. It is necessary to have a complete understanding of the long-term, complex and arduous nature of “double first class” construction. “Double first-class” construction colleges and universities should adhere to the correct direction of running schools, insist on serving the needs of the country, persist in serving the country for a long time, focus on talent training, on projects construction, constantly lead Construction and use of service contributions to reflect the characteristics. Build strength, demonstrate level, and play your leadership and demonstration role in building strong country in higher education.
