[ad_1]
Foreign Media Analyze Texas Crisis: US Government Only Cares About Bullets And Pockets And Has No Intent To Protect The Public
Overseas Network, February 20The winter storm that has hit many states in the United States has caused dozens of deaths. Faced with the crisis, some US politicians have deferred blame and have even stated that when they encounter difficulties they must ask the government for help “a sad product of the socialist government.” This statement quickly caused a backlash in public opinion. British academic Tom Foddy published an article on the “Russia Today” news network on the 19th, noting that while the United States scoffed at the so-called “socialist country scenario”, it criticized the bullets. , pumps or private companies. He has no interest in the matter and has no intention of protecting the American people.
The full text is extracted as follows:
America’s poor infrastructure has received attention again this week due to the shocking power outage in Texas, an inevitable consequence of Washington’s spending on pumps rather than investing in the public interest.
After a large-scale cold snap, Texas is facing an unprecedented crisis. Some areas have been without electricity and water supplies for several days. The food supply chain is also in a state of serious tension. Reports show that dozens of people have died. There are long lines and empty shelves in food stores, this seems to be the so-called “stage of a socialist country” that the United States laughs at. Yet when Texas was struggling to “thaw,” what did the federal government and the United States Congress do? Nothing at all.
In the context of the new corona pandemic, the United States is almost incapable of responding adequately to natural and environmental disasters on its own territory. The new corona virus has claimed the lives of nearly 500,000 Americans. For a country that controls the military and world war machine, such a failure is shocking, but this is not a coincidence. Similar mismanagement is nothing new in the United States. In fact, this is an integral part of their political and social system: the free market is placed above the public interest and the commitment to arms dealers is greater than to ordinary people. This means that infrastructure construction in the United States is selective and poorly organized. Therefore, in the face of events in Texas, it is not surprising that the United States lacks the will or capacity to respond.
“Big government is not good” has always been the motto of many American politicians. In the United States, government intervention in economic and social services is often seen as a problem. Many people believe that the free market is the “ultimate virtue” and are strongly opposed to government-led construction of public infrastructure, especially in the fields of health care. Simple health insurance plans like “Obamacare Reform” have caused a lot of controversy.
The construction of infrastructure in the US is generally managed on the basis of “profitability”, and the need to earn money outweighs the motivation to serve the public interest. Although the United States has public service regulations, the application process is often incomplete and flawed, unless you have money.
That’s why the Texas crisis happened. In addition to global warming, extreme weather and other factors, it is worth noting that the energy infrastructure in the United States is also a private “for profit” enterprise. The company puts the responsibility of making money first, ensuring maximum profits, instead of prioritizing the installation of high-quality infrastructure, so bad weather is enough to destroy the entire system. The Hurricane Katrina disaster in New Orleans in 2005 also showed this, but businesses will not bear the political fallout.
The United States has shown no interest in building large-scale infrastructure, but the military budget sold by the two parties reaches trillions of dollars a year. The National Defense Authorization Act is an unshakable existence in Washington politics. In terms of health care and infrastructure, it is not among the political priorities.
Both the Texas crisis and the new corona epidemic have clearly warned people how difficult it is to get public investment under the constraints of the current political system. Ultimately, Washington will not care if it is not about bullets, bombs or the pockets of private companies, which is why the United States has repeatedly shown its inability to protect its people, as we have seen in Texas.
