The principle of “Secretary Lu” should not be vague



[ad_1]

In the Dalian incident of “the street cadre did not cooperate with the epidemic prevention registry and asked Secretary Lu to coordinate,” both the street cadre and secretary Lu were punished. According to relevant reports, the street cadre involved is Wang Chenming, deputy director of the Dalian Youyi sub-district office, and Secretary Lu is the deputy secretary of the sub-district community party committee. They both have a superior relationship. The topic “What should you do if you are Secretary Lu” has aroused public opinion.

Some netizens think this is a difficult question to answer: if you reject Director Wang, you will offend others and be “wearing little shoes”; if he gives the leader an “open mouth”, he will also be punished if something goes wrong. Some netizens offered suggestions and discussed the “best of both worlds” approach. For example, they told the volunteers that this is Director Wang from the sub-district office. I have your information here and will report it to you by phone; for example, come to the site to help the leader register, and at the same time I want to thank the volunteers for adhering to the principles and the community is relieved. Some even ridiculed that Secretary Lu could say when answering the phone: “Hey, hey, I can’t hear you, I don’t have a signal here.”

It was hotly discussed “What should Secretary Lu do?”, Reflecting that it is in fact difficult for grassroots staff to deny others, especially requests from leaders. But hot discussion turns into hot discussion and ridicule becomes ridiculous. In this answer, the principle cannot be vague, and the background must not be missed! In the face of unfulfilled requests and requests from senior leaders, Secretary Lu should justly refuse to persuade leaders to sign up as required rather than letting volunteers let them go. This is a matter of principle and there is no flexibility. You ran to the scene today to deal with it, and you helped the leader register, and you lied that the cell phone had no signal. And tomorrow, next time? Rounding or avoiding is not a way. When persuading the leader, the attitude should be clear: the leader, if he does what he says hello, we will all violate the discipline rules!

Please resist those who violate the rules and laws, there is no ambiguity in between, otherwise things will happen sooner or later. For Secretary Lu, this time it’s to say hello and ask you to just sign in and let go. You’ve passed. So the next time the leader asks you to misuse public funds to help her reimburse her personal expenses, are you still feeling embarrassed? Actually, there are no such cases. He Bingrong, a former member of the Standing Committee of the Zhejiang Jiaxing Municipal Committee, repeatedly requested his subordinates to use public funds to buy 1,470 bottles of high-end drinks; Qin Jie, the former deputy CEO of Guizhou Expressway Group Co., Ltd. arranged for his subordinates to take state-owned assets for the purchase of golf membership cards. Following such “instructions” is obviously a violation of discipline and law. Fan Yonggang, former Deputy Director of the Ningxian Public Security Bureau in Qingyang City, Gansu Province, was sentenced to prison by both himself and his superiors for trespassing and enforcing the illegal revocation of criminal case filing orders. by senior leaders and complacency of crimes. It can be said that the lessons are very deep, if you adhere to the principles, you must adhere to them.

Behind the argument that “Secretary Lu is embarrassed” also reflects that there is still a lot of room for survival in society in relational science and hidden rules. Some people find it helpful to say hello and find a relationship, but they unknowingly coerce her from victim to acquiescence, or even facilitator of unhealthy tendencies. In fact, you can benefit from such unspoken rules for a time, but in the long run, everyone falls victim to undermining fairness and justice. Therefore, although it may seem difficult to refuse to greet the leader, you have to do it firmly for yourself and for the social environment. If every “Secretary Lu” dared to say no to unspoken rules and relationship science, and everyone worked hard to set the rules and be honest, I think the question “What should Secretary Lu do” will be every time best.

Discussion is also a consensus-building process. Public opinion is excited about what to do with Secretary Lu, who is nothing more than a lively education class. Among them are criticisms of the privileges of party members and cadres, praise for the persistence of the volunteers, and suggestions to improve anti-epidemic registration measures, if they can be more informative and intelligent, etc. There are many things worth thinking about. More people have learned lessons from Secretary Lu’s live cases and strengthened their confidence to say no to greetings: “I’m sorry to the leader, we have to follow the rules on this matter. I can’t afford to be the next Secretary Lu. . (Lan Linzong)

[ad_2]