[ad_1]
According to the “Office of the Foreign Office Spokesperson”, at the regular Foreign Office press conference on December 1, a journalist asked: Yesterday, the Australian Prime Minister claimed that the personal tweets of the Foreign Office Spokesperson Foreign China about the Australian soldiers were “fake photos”. Last night, the Weibo officer of the Australian Embassy in China posted a Weibo saying the image was a “fake photo”. What is China’s comment?
Hua Chunying said, fake photos? The Australian side accuses China of using false or forged photos, and even that China spreads false information. This accusation itself is false, because what is circulating on the Internet is not a “photo”, but an illustration drawn by a young Chinese man using a computer. The illustrations drawn are different from the fake photos. This illustration is based on a research report confirmed by the Australian Ministry of Defense. Although it is an illustration, it reflects facts.
I realized that yesterday Chinese netizens were talking about the Australian performance, and the author of this painting was also interviewed by the media. The author is reported to have told the media: “Mr. Morrison, what the soldiers did is far more cruel than my paintings.”
Before attending the press conference, I especially asked my colleagues to print some photos from the internet and the investigation report from the Australian Ministry of Defense.
These are facts, there are images and the truth, they are all things published by Australia itself. Many people like me are thinking: Why do some people in Australia react so surprisingly to this issue? The Australian side lashed out and harassed, and its true purpose was to use this painting to divert attention, avoid contradictions and transfer pressure, in an attempt to transform the criticism and condemnation of some Australian soldiers for killing innocent Afghan civilians by opinion international public in a show of strength and harmony with China. Be tough. Everyone sees this very clearly.
I also saw an article from the public WeChat account today, which is very good, the title is “I can, you can not, why?” I think this phrase speaks to the aspirations of many Chinese. In fact, some people always treat China with the “I can, you can’t” mentality. For example, in terms of technology, I can have 5G, but you cannot; financially, I can surpass you, but you cannot; in public opinion, I can openly attack you, openly support the “independence of Tibet”, openly support the “independence of Taiwan” and openly Support the separatist forces in Xinjiang, openly support the Hong Kong opposition and violent violators of the law to hit, smash and loot, but you can’t. This “I can, you can’t” mentality actually reflects the inexplicable and unreasonable arrogance and hypocrisy of some people. Its true purpose is to deprive China of the right to tell the truth. They were afraid that someone would say out loud, “Look! The emperor is not wearing new clothes!”
Therefore, in addressing the question of what is “false information”, I hope that relevant people can calm down, take a rational thought, take a calm and rational view of the development of China and China, and take constructive action, work together with China and face it directly. Solving problems properly, jointly maintaining the healthy development of bilateral relations in a spirit of equality and mutual respect, can this really satisfy the expectations of the people and the fundamental and long-term interests of the countries involved?
(CCTV reporter Zhao Jing Kong Luyuan)
