Guangming.com Commenter: Stop “parents correcting homework,” is it worth celebrating?



[ad_1]

【Reading tips】At least ten provinces across the country have stopped “Homework Proofing Parents” and included them individually in school performance management.

Guangming Net Commenter:Today (November 11), there are media reports that the educational authorities of at least 10 provinces and autonomous regions have responded to the issue of requests from primary and secondary teachers for “parents to correct homework” which has recently been widely concerned in the field of public opinion. In response, “homework correction parents” were stopped.

The relevant regulations of the educational authority have clear attitudes and clear limits I believe that “correcting homework” will no longer be a problem that bothers parents. However, this question has been clarified, is it really worth celebrating as a good voice in the field of public opinion? After “correcting homework”, will there be new problems that will make parents struggle with it?

Parents are asked to stop correcting assignments, requiring teachers to correct assignments “in person” and to monitor and inspect the situation in which teachers correct assignments. Does this type of regulation give people a sense of violation? If such a rule applies, is it not equivalent to saying that farmers should go to the fields to cultivate and that doctors should contact patients for medical treatment? Therefore, in addition to giving people a sense of violation, such regulations actually reveal the quality of education and teaching in schools that allow parents to correct their homework and mark the bottom line of education and schooling. management of teaching in these places.

Today, the methods of education and teaching are constantly developing, but at least in the current situation, correcting students’ assignments is still one of the lowest points of the way of teaching, and it remains one of the contents. basic teaching and teaching. Teachers who correct homework are not faced with a paper, but with scoring their own teaching achievements, which is the most important teacher-student interaction content in teaching activities. Without this link, it can be said with certainty that the school will not teach and will not learn. Therefore, the basic common sense of education is clearly established in the regulations. If such regulations are not considered sad, at least they are not worth celebrating.

Of course, on the other hand, above the bottom line, outside of obligations, parents are not prohibited from participating in their children’s homework process. There is a saying: happy families are similar, but unfortunate families have their own misfortunes. In fact, looking around us, if there are similarities between students who learn well and perform well, it is that the parents of these students have participated in the various activities of homework and their children’s growth. And this kind of involvement doesn’t mean that parents will do the work themselves, but it can include “correcting homework.” This type of voluntary participation, which is not a designated obligation for teachers, is actually a necessary prerequisite for students to achieve school work and academic success, both at home and abroad.

However, making voluntary parental behavior an obligation amounts to raising the overall costs and standards of school work and academic success, eliminating the fringe benefits of voluntary parental behaviors. Here, the appointment of teachers is actually a kind of compulsion. This type of designation is embedded with terrible results that all parents do, and with the help of other common sense such as “efforts pay off,” a seemingly reasonable causal link is established between this terrible result and not performing as designated. This designation has been appended to the mandatory “at your own risk”. Most of the current parents of school-age students have only one child. How coercive this type of “consequence” is can be seen in the parents’ reaction to this designation.

(To reprint, indicate source “Guangming.com” and author “Guangming.com commenter”)

【Previous】Disclosure of personal information needs to be classified as a felony.

Guangming Net Commentator: Stop the

[
责编:王营 ]

[ad_2]