[ad_1]
Original Title: Election Observation in the US | Melee News Media Box
Original a Japanese pumpkin essence head A Japanese pumpkin essence head
Today’s headlines are none other than the US presidential election.
Due to the real-time voting system, the election in the United States is also particularly exciting. To keep up with the progress of the data update and provide a good interpretation of the data for the audience, major media outlets have launched real-time data visualization pages to track the progress of the general elections, and the Graphics and interaction design can also be described as unique tricks. Next, we will present the cutting edge graphical report for everyone:
First, let’s take a look at the most basic chart styles. Search for “US Elections.” Go to Google and you will see a page like this. This is also the map format most used by the media in these general elections: blue represents the Democratic Party and red the Republican Party. States that have decided to win are represented by darker colors, while states that are still counting votes are represented by darker colors. Light colors indicate states that have not started counting votes are indicated in gray. For example, in the figure below, the vote count in Florida is not yet complete, but Trump has the overall advantage, so it is shown in light red.
In Chinese media, the display of Phoenix.com is the same design idea:
Of course, this design also hides certain information. For example, the progress of the count for each state cannot be seen on the graph, and the progress of the count often indicates whether the current data can still be reversed. For this reason, many media have also adopted different design schemes.
For example, Canadian media global news added a linking and interaction function based on the red and blue map. When the mouse is moved to a state that is still counting votes, the pie chart below will light up to show the progress of the count. For example, in the image below we can see that Florida has completed 91% of the vote count, while Trump is still slightly ahead.
Similarly, the Washington Post has added a series of line graphs to the bottom of the map, so that not only can you see the progress of the vote count in each state, but you also haven’t seen the change in the number of votes. over time, so that you can see each state more clearly The deadlock:
Among the mainstream media, the general style of the New York Times is more rigorous. On your map, all states where vote counting has not been completed appear in dark gray, and the progress of the count is displayed in state words. This also means the attitude of the New York Times: before the results are not established, it is not easy to draw conclusions. At the same time, the New York Times also added a lot of additional information around the map, such as the latest information from social media (on the left side of the image above), election forecasts (on the right side of the image from above), etc., together to form a board (board), so that the wealth of information is relatively high.
Also, many outlets have made more innovative designs for maps.
For example, in addition to supporting the visualization of the general electoral situation for each state, Fox can also display specific data for each county:
Reuters has taken a similar approach, but does not show geographic information for each county, instead only focusing on the number of voters and supporting parties in each county. Therefore, from this image, we can intuitively see that many of Biden’s votes come from more populated areas, while Trump’s ticket warehouse is primarily small towns. This also indirectly reflects differences in the source of their supporters and electoral strategies.
The table mentioned above actually reflects a very important design idea, that is, in the US general election, the geographic information of each state (that is, where is the border and how big is the area) in not really important. The important thing is how many votes each state has, and this is actually determined by the population of each state. Therefore, when designing maps, many outlets have chosen to ignore geographic information and emphasize the number of ticket stores in each state. This type of map is also called a cartogram, and the Chinese name can be called a warped map.
For example, Reuters simplified each state into a square. Although the general arrangement is still in accordance with the geographical position, the actual geographical limits have been omitted:
A similar design can also be seen on the Chinese website:
Politico divides each state into small squares, the number of small squares indicates the number of state-owned banknote stores. Therefore, this design adds another layer of information than the previous graph, and it is obvious which states have a greater influence on the final election results:
Bloomberg also adopted this scheme:
The Financial Times adopted a compromise solution, which includes geographic and square information as a reference for ticket stores:
In addition to geographical distribution, the mainstream media also conducted an in-depth analysis of the various dimensions of the choice, which in turn produced a wealth of interesting data tables.
For example, Fox News will split the histogram when it shows the voting progress. Users can easily verify the source of the votes.
270towin supports real-time table update. Whenever a state completes the vote count, the table will add a row and the expected win rates for the two candidates will also update in real time:
The New York Times uses a board-like graph to display forecast results
A bubble chart is used to show the counting process and the volume of votes in each state.
Use a line graph to reflect the increase or decrease in votes for the two candidates:
A colored form was also used to display the candidate’s iron vote store and the vote count in the transition state. For example, the following figure shows that more than half of the iron ticket deposits have been counted for the two. Oscillating states in the middle still have greater uncertainty.
The National Public Radio of the United States chose to use a bubble chart in real time to show the stagnation of the votes. States with a strong trend are located on the left and right sides, and in the middle are the states with the most severe swing, such as Texas and Florida:
The Guardian chose to display the historical voting results of each key state in chronological form to provide a reference for the current election:
The Financial Times offers an interactive feature. This page shows the states that have not yet voted. Users can click on these statuses based on the results of their predictions to see how their results affect the election process in real time. For example, when a user clicks on Biden to win in Ohio, Biden’s votes will be added to Ohio’s votes:
Of course, in this melee of the letter, there will inevitably be some input or design “accidents”. For example, 270towin counted it as Trump’s victory before vote counting was completed in Florida, so his real-time data was different from other outlets:
In designing the graphic, Australian outlet ABC did not take into account the common sense of the Democrats on the left and Republican on the right, placing Trump on the left, resulting in obvious differences between its design and other outlets.
In addition, slow data updates, web page errors, mobile phone adaptation failures, etc. have also appeared to some extent.
For the press, despite the long history of information on electoral data, new technologies and new tricks continue to appear every year. Especially with the development of display technology and interactive technology, data transmission is faster, and the way of presentation and exploration is constantly enriched, which also gives readers the opportunity to participate in important public events and even witness the history.
————————————————
Website source:
https://www.270towin.com/2020-election-results-live/
https://www.foxnews.com/elections/2020/general-results
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/11/03/us/elections/results-president.html?action=click&module=Spotlight&pgtype=Homepage
https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2020-us-election-results
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2020/nov/03/us-election-2020-live-results-donald-trump-joe-biden-who-won-presidential-republican- democrat
https://www.washingtonpost.com/
https://www.politico.com/2020-election/results/president/
https://www.npr.org/2020/11/03/928083390/2020-presidential-election-results-live?t=1604457621320
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election/us2020/results
https://ig.ft.com/us-election-2020/
https://graphics.reuters.com/USA-ELECTION/RESULTS-LIVE-US/jbyprxelqpe/
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-11-04/us-election-live-updates-donald-trump-joe-biden-president/12845366
https://globalnews.ca/news/7427933/us-election-results-live-real-time-election-results-america-votes/
-the end- People who like this content also like
Original title: “US Election Observation | News Media Chart Melee”
