[ad_1]
Original title: The new version of the “Regulation on national science and technology awards”: more transparency, stricter supervision and weakness
Xinhua News Agency, Beijing, October 28 Title: More transparency, stricter supervision and deutility —— Interpretation of the new edition of the “National Science and Technology AwardsRegulations》 Three highlights
Xinhua News Agency reporters Dong Ruifeng and Wen Jinghua
The “Regulation of the National Science and Technology Awards” has been revised for the third time and was officially announced a few days ago, and will be implemented on December 1, 2020.
As an important part of a series of reforms to the science and technology award system, the new version of the regulation seeks to adjust the “witness” and use a more transparent and rigorous system design to promoteexcitementIndependent innovation, stimulating the vitality of talents, creating a good environment for innovation, while avoiding an excessive utilitarian orientation and guiding science and technology.jobsThe author returned to the original intention of scientific investigation.
Aspect 1: “Recommendation” becomes “nomination” and transparency of procedures becomes a rigid requirement
One of the most important aspects of the new version of the regulation is the implementation of the reform requirements for the adjustment of scientific and technological awards from the “recommendation system” to the “nomination system”. The latter is also an internationally accepted practice.
For a long time, China’s science and technology awards have adopted the following methods: the administrative department has issued a series of recommendations, each unit has organized scientific and technological personnel to apply for the award, and the unit has been selected and recommended to the National Office of Science and Technology Awards. There have always been different voices in science and technology circles, believing that administrative “offside” has led to insufficient “gold content” in some recommended awards.
Since the Central Leading Group for Comprehensive Deepening Reforms reviewed and approved the “Plan to Deepen Reform of the Science and Technology Awards System” in 2017, the national science and technology awards changed from “active self-recommendation” to ” another passive recommendation “in the following year. This revision of the regulations has raised this reform measure to the level of regulations.
The competent person in charge of the Ministry of Science and Technology presented that the method of awarding prizes should be reformed and a system of nominations should be implemented by experts, academics, organizations and related departments. Based on adherence to government leadership, the role of experts and academics should be fully utilized to strengthen the academic character of the awards.
At the same time, strengthen the nomination.responsibilityThe nominator will nominate in strict accordance with the nomination method, provide nomination materials, be responsible for the authenticity and accuracy of the materials, and assume appropriate responsibilities in accordance with regulations.
As a procedural guarantee, the new regulation also establishes rigid requirements for transparency in the review process Clarifying that review activities adhere to the principles of openness, fairness and fairness, and that review methods, total rewards, results must be provided of rewards and other information tosocietyAnnounced.
Aspect 2: Build “IntegrityArchives “to increase supervision and punishment
Researchers and individual institutions violate ethics or misconduct in scientific research, etc.behaviorAfter a few years of avoiding being the center of attention, appeared on the list of technology awards, this kind of situation has beenpublic opinionquestion.
The new regulations focus on establishing a credit system for science and technology awards, requiring that the National Science and Technology Awards “veto” the aforementioned individuals or organizations at the nomination stage, and establish scientific research on experts, academics, review organizations and committees, review experts and nominees. Gross dishonestydatabase。
Regulations also increase supervision and punishment of science and technology awards. On the one hand, supervisionCommitteeSupervise the entire process of nomination, review, and handling of objections in accordance with the relevant measures, and report to the National Committee for Science and Technology Awards.reportMonitor the situation.
On the other hand, the corresponding legal responsibilities are stipulated for each subject of the reward activities. Persons and organizations that violate the regulations and have serious dishonesty in the integrity of scientific research will be registered in the database of serious dishonesty in the integrity of scientific research, and joint penalties will be applied in accordance with relevant national regulations.
longLi Zhimin, former director of the Center for Scientific and Technological Development of the Ministry of Education, which is engaged in the investigation of the science and technology award system, said that “a veto vote” for misconduct in scientific research, “tolerance zero “for award enforcement and ongoing liability for violators. Such oversight and punishment will allow for fairer and more authoritative national science and technology awards, and they also create a clean academic environment for scientific researchers and guide them to focus on research and develop its potential.
Aspect 3: Strengthen the honor, re-reward the “initial heart”
For a time, national science and technology awards were tied to subject evaluation, talent evaluation, degree setting, and even academic selection, prompting a flood of awards from some scientific researchers.
“This is the rewarding side effect of much discussion in science and technology circles. It makes honor utilitarian and deviates from the original purpose of science and technology awards.” Li Zhimin said that the reform of the national science and technology award system is being further deepened, which will better solve the efficiency and effectiveness of scientific research. Fair balance problem.
The new version of the regulation clearly stipulates that it is prohibited to use the name of the National Prize for Science and Technology to seek illegitimate profits.
The relevant head of the Ministry of Science and Technology said that the honor of scientific and technological awards should be strengthened, and the National Science and Technology Award will be awarded to scientific and technological workers who pursue the truth, study with great concentration, have Experience in learning, have experience in research, dare to overcome and climb to the top.
Tan Hualin, deputy director of the personnel department of the China Science and Technology Association, said that the China Science and Technology Cooperation is an organization of the academic community and has been deeply involved in the nomination, recommendation, evaluation and evaluation of the national science and technology awards for a long time. In the future, in accordance with the requirements of the new version of the regulations, the role of the academic community to promote the return of science and technology awards to honor itself will be fulfilled.
It is reported that after the new version of the “Regulation on National Science and Technology Awards”, a series of supporting documents, such as the implementing rules, will also be published one after another. The next step will be to standardize various science and technology awards, reduce the number of awards, and increase the awards.quality。
(Source: Xinhua News Agency)
(Editor in charge: DF010)
I solemnly declare: The purpose of this information disclosed by Oriental Fortune.com is to spread more information and has nothing to do with this booth.
[ad_2]