[ad_1]
Original caption: A large quantity of nutritious meals at a rural elementary school in Anhui province were abandoned in response to the accusation of avoiding the grave
Original title: A phrase “difficult to adjust”
Recently, the issue of nutritious meals at a rural primary school in Fuyang, Anhui, has received wide public attention.
Regarding the problem that a lot of nutritious meals were thrown away in this school, various parties have different opinions: some students said “the taste is very bad”, some parents criticized it as “too apprehensive”, and the school principal thinks “taste is okay”, mainly “Hard to reach”.
Each student has different tastes and preferences, so there is likely to be a “hard to adjust” possibility. The unified distribution of nutritious meals in schools cannot solve the “hard to adjust” problem and can only meet the needs of most people to the greatest extent possible. Today, nutritious meals are abnormally dismissed by students, obviously not because of “difficulty adjusting”, but probably because of “dissatisfaction.”
In May 2012, 15 departments, including the Ministry of Education, issued 5 supporting documents including the “Detailed Rules for the Implementation of the Nutrition Improvement Plan for Rural Compulsory Education Students” to ensure the effective implementation of the plan. nutrition for students. It is clearly stipulated that according to the nutritional status of the students, meat, eggs, milk and other foods with higher nutritional value should be selected as the main content of the meal according to the dietary nutrition guidelines or formulated diets by the expert group, and a regular and quantitative supply system should be established. Ensure adequate energy and nutrient intake for students.
In contrast to national regulations on nutritious meals, the “nutritional value” of this primary school in Fuyang is really doubtful. The nutritious meal that was thrown was reportedly a local noodle dish in Fuyang called “steamed noodles,” which contained bean sprouts, green vegetables, and pulled pork. However, judging from the exposed photos of nutritious meals, there are too many noodles, too few vegetables, and no oily water. It is impossible to see how high the nutritional value is. Such a nutritious meal is not only difficult to provide students with rich nutrition, it is also difficult for students to voluntarily enjoy it.
The waste caused by throwing away nutritious meals is obvious, which is inconsistent with the “DC Action” advocated by society. This type of waste should be avoided, but it is not about forcing students to eat foods they do not want to eat, but to start by improving the nutritious meal configuration. Ultimately, it is necessary for nutritious meals to be truly nutritious, it is necessary to eliminate the unscientific food configuration, and it is necessary to prevent some people from unduly benefiting from students’ teeth. In recent years, there have been many cases of corruption in school canteens exposed by the media. For example, the director of the General Affairs Office of a primary school in Wuxi embezzled 1.31 million yuan from students’ lunch expenses. After calculating 8.5 yuan per person, the lunch fee was deducted by 5 yuan, which is simply outrageous. .
The nutritious meals at this primary school in Fuyang are prepared by a fast food company called “Kaidao Kitchen” in Fuyang. This company uniformly supplies meals to schools in Yingdong, Fuyang District. Today, there is a problem that students throw away nutritious meals. We also need to do a self-test: Is it the students’ problem or the nutritious food itself? Relevant management departments should also strengthen supervision to ensure that the nutritional value of nutritious meals meets the requirements, and at the same time check whether the distribution of nutritious meals is messy and whether someone is improperly profiting.
Faced with the phenomenon of students throwing nutritious meals, some adults are used to accusing students of “never going hungry, not knowing that food is precious” and “being hungry for three meals to see if they eat or not.” . It has always been easier to criticize others based on past personal experiences, and there may be some truth, but sometimes it is inevitable that they are preconceived, because they ignore the current situation and lead to the result of “talking to ducks”. This is not an era of lack of food and clothing, student demand has shifted from “eat a full meal” to “eat a good meal.”
It is shameful to waste food, it is also shameful to provide food without nutrition and without appetite, and the idea and practice of requiring students to eat it in the name of fighting waste is also shameful and unrealistic. (Ding Jianting)
