[ad_1]
Original title: At the end of March, nearly 80% of first instance stock cases were closed by courts across the country.
The reporter learned from the Anti-Criminal Office of the Supreme People’s Court a few days ago that in the “Hundred-Day Approach” campaign launched this year, courts at all levels across the country resolutely implemented the requirements of the “Six Cleanups” operation. “and coordinated the prevention and control of epidemics and special struggles. At the end of July, a total of 6,016 gang-related first instance cases and 2,916 second instance cases were concluded. At the end of March, the rate of completion of the cases of actions in the first previous instance reached 79.90%. The “case resolution” progressed rapidly and the “black money cleaning the fund” achieved remarkable results.
Since the beginning of the special fight, courts at all levels across the country have reportedly adhered to the mechanism guidance and standardized guidelines, taking multiple steps to overcome difficulties, and prosecuting criminal cases and penalties has continued to advance steadily. The People’s Supreme Court requires that courts at all levels handle cases strictly in accordance with the law, calling meetings and issuing documents, insisting that equal emphasis be placed on the punishment of crimes and the protection of human rights, the strict punishment in accordance with the law, and both leniency and rigor, and strictly abide by the principles of legal crimes and penalties and evidence-based trials, no degradation Enjoy and don’t make up the numbers. In order to clarify the legal and political limits, the People’s Supreme Court took the initiative in drafting a series of normative documents for the handling of cases of “forces of evil”, “routine loans” and “illegal loans”. and further standardized the case management procedures, strengthened the protection of rights and strengthened the management of the property involved in the case. The formulation and issuance of notices effectively guarantees the quality and effectiveness of the execution of the trial.
The higher people’s courts have paid close attention to the implementation of their responsibilities, generally establishing the “Six-Cleaans” campaign to attack the headquarters, refining work accounts, formulating detailed plans, pooling resources, and pooling general efforts. The higher courts in Beijing, Heilongjiang, Jiangsu, Hunan and Shaanxi have strengthened the mechanism for court leadership to commission cases. Courts in Liaoning, Jilin, Sichuan, Guizhou and elsewhere generally implement the presiding judge to take the lead in handling important, difficult and complicated cases. Tianjin, Hebei, Guangdong, Hainan and other higher institutes have taken the initiative to establish a joint cooperation mechanism with other agencies to play an active role in promoting “cleanliness” and “bottom cleanliness.”
It is understood that to overcome the adverse effects of the epidemic, courts at all levels across the country are taking full advantage of the legal aid functions of technology and big data, actively promoting the construction of smart courts, and adopting new trials as in online, “online + offline” and cloud trials. Methods to solve real problems. The Heilongjiang Court adopted a combination of online and offline methods and successfully tried Yu Wenbo’s case in relation to the crime. The Nantong, Xuzhou and Lianyungang Courts in Jiangsu have established science and technology courts in detention centers and are connected to the “Zhiyun” trial system. The Anhui Court uses the AB Court to maintain the courts centrally, separating the court where the defendant participates in the trial from the court that houses the collegiate panel members, prosecutors, advocates and observers. The courts are held simultaneously by video transmission. Jiangxi court innovatively used “cloud video” technology to promote “cloud court”, held interprovincial hearings and successfully tried three cases related to Ouyang Ping, including criminal case involving gangs in the country. The Sichuan court adopted the “cloud test + live broadcast” model to conduct “zero contact” tests, not realizing that there is “no mistake” between epidemic prevention and control and test work . (Li Yang)
