[ad_1]
Original title: 98.1% of respondents said they would resist eating and spreading such food waste
China Youth DailyChina Youth Daily Reporter Du Yuanchun Sunshan
The eating and transmitting “big stomach king”, which is known for its strong taste and vomiting after eating, has recently come under fire. Many video website platforms have started rectifying eating and streaming videos that waste food. How to deal with the “Eat and Broadcast” by Big Stomach King? How to strengthen the management of the phenomenon of food and broadcasting?
Last week, the China Youth Daily Social Survey Center and the Social Survey Center conducted a 2006 interviewees survey, which showed that disgust and worry are the main feelings of interviewees when they see the “King of Big Stomach “eating and broadcasting. , 62.1% of the interviewees believe that the food and broadcast of the “king of the big stomach” spread unhealthy diet concepts, and 98.1% of the interviewees said bluntly that they would get rid of it (Internet terms to stop following) and would resist food and food waste transmission.
Disgust and concern are the main feelings of those interviewed when seeing the “Big Stomach King”
Liu Ke (pseudonym) works at a public institution in Beijing. She often watched when eating and broadcasting was hot: “Watching bloggers eat a variety of delicacies, she also has an appetite. But since fake food induces vomiting and other phenomena are exposed, I don’t like it.”
Yu Feifei (pseudonym), an employee of a state-owned company in Beijing, told reporters that she usually slides the “king of the big stomach” eating and broadcasting directly, “looking at the exaggerated food placed in front of the camera and the presenter’s mouth. full of sauce. ‘Party and eat’, I have no appetite at all. I can’t understand why some people like to watch. “
Regarding the feelings of seeing “Big Stomach King” eating and broadcasting, 48.6% of the respondents expressed their displeasure and 32.5% of the respondents were concerned. Others include: curiosity (31.9%), cannot stand looking directly (26.4%), decompression (25.0%), anguish (23.7%), etc.
Zhou Xiao (pseudonym), an employee of a certain institution, felt that the creation of the “king of the big stomach” is totally unreasonable. “There are very few people who actually eat a lot, and the stomach is so big. Eating like this will definitely affect the digestive system and the body. Healthy. The children watched these videos and thought it was normal to eat a lot, which led to misconceptions of diet. “.
“A lot of so-called ‘big stomachs’ are used to induce vomiting after eating, just to create tricks, attract traffic, and waste a lot of food. It’s really violent,” Yu Feifei said.
In the survey, 62.1% of the interviewees believed that eating and broadcasting the “king of the big stomach” spread unhealthy dietary concepts, 55.2% of the interviewees considered it contrary to the virtues of diligence and saving , and 54.6% of those interviewed said bluntly that waste is serious and leads to wrong values. , 40.5% of the respondents felt that there was no sensation of beauty and reduced their appetite.
Tang Zhisong, dean of the Education Research Institute at Southwest University, believes that the spread of videos eating and broadcasting “big stomach kings” reflects, on the one hand, that some people lack lofty ideals and ambitions and seek attention with low-key fun. level as a trick. On the other hand, it also reflects certain people. Some media or online operators lack a sense of social responsibility and ignore social ethics to attract traffic and attention.
He believes that the negative effect of the phenomenon of food and the transmission of the “king of the big stomach” is obvious. The first is that it does not favor the promotion of social conservation, which causes strain on social resources caused by waste. Second, it is very unfavorable for the formation of the moral character of children and even destroys a growing group of young people.
Zhu Yi, associate professor at the School of Food Sciences and Nutritional Engineering of China Agricultural University, believes that eating and broadcasting “the king of the big stomach” should not be limited to criticism, but should be prohibited. He pointed out that most meals and broadcasts, whether born with a large stomach or a fake food to induce vomiting, will cause irreparable harm to the body. Not only can frequent vomiting damage the lining of the esophagus and cause gastroesophageal reflux and esophagitis, it can also erode the teeth and eventually lead to anorexia. And bingeing is a major predisposing factor for pancreatitis. “Eating and transmitting, which appears to have no threshold, is actually unhealthy behavior at the cost of health overdraft and should be banned and discarded.”
68.7% of respondents want to eliminate food waste videos and anchor accounts
“Eating and streaming short videos have few barriers to practice and are easy to fake. Today, their tastes have completely changed.” Yu Feifei frankly said that he has never paid attention to any “king of big stomachs” that bloggers eat and broadcast. The platform must first take social responsibility and control the content.
In the survey, 88.5% of respondents expect to strengthen governance of food and broadcasting. 98.1% of those interviewed said bluntly that they would reject food and broadcasts that waste food such as pretending to eat and vomit, among them, 69.1% of those interviewed will definitely do so and 29.0% of those interviewed should I do it. Only 1.9% said no.
68.7% of those interviewed expect to delete and close videos and anchor accounts that have food waste, such as eating and vomiting.
Zhu Yi said that the current opposition to the phenomenon of serious food waste by eating and transmitting is more from the mental and health level, and he hopes that the whole society will form a tendency to appreciate and preserve food. “Eating is for health and enjoyment, not to ruin the body and gain power. Reward. We want to ‘eat’ as we are. This is the basis of national health.”
Tang Zhisong said that the treatment of food waste can be cut from multiple perspectives: one is to openly discuss and criticize this phenomenon through television and live webcasts, and produce a wide range of immediate effects; second, to publish scientific and rational research by academics in related fields Sex articles carry out in-depth discussions and criticism, which have a profound theoretical impact, the third is to use the role model propaganda of film and television stars to influence Young.
Regarding the governance of the “king of the big stomach” eating and broadcasting, 73.2% of respondents suggested that the platform should strengthen content review and supervision and management, 56.5% of respondents agreed agreed to set food savings reminders in a prominent position on the website, and 46.4% suggested Guide gastronomy and broadcasting to actively convey correct concepts of restoration and consumption.
Among those surveyed, post-00s accounted for 5.7%, post-90s accounted for 38.7%, post-80s accounted for 44.0%, post-70s accounted for 9.1% and those after 60 represented 2.1%.
Massive information, accurate interpretation, all in the Sina Finance APP
Editor in Charge: Xue Yongwei
