Cannibalistic moths help scientists understand how extreme selfishness develops



Scientists have naturally found a way to stop carnivorous moths from eating their siblings. It is a place to get to know each other.

Indian food moths, or pantry moths (Plodia interpunctella), Is usually a voracious vegetarian, which feeds on flour, cereals, rice and other packaged foods as a young caterpillar. However, if there is not enough nutrition around, or if there are too many moths in the brood, these larvae can sometimes turn on each other to feed both strangers and relatives.

It’s some ruthless survival behavior, but new research suggests that this moth-eating mentality is not inherent in species. In a friendly situation, these insects can be quite friendly.

When researchers manipulated the distance of five straight moth populations, they found that more stretched conditions have led to very low cannibalism in just ten generations.

“Families that were very narcissistic did not do the same in that system,” says Walker Rudolph, a biologist at Rice University.

“Families that were less cannibalistic had lower mortality rates and more offspring.”

The findings support a previously undisturbed theory behind the evolution of social behavior. A team of researchers, including Rudolph and the first author of the moth study, Mike Boots, a biologist at the University of California, Berkeley, suggested that when animals make more contact, the rate of cannibalism decreases. This is because the chances of meeting and eating your relative are statistically higher in the denser cluster and in the end, it will be disadvantageous.

In short, the closer a family unit is, the less likely they are to kill each other.

A new micro-evolutionary experiment puts this theory to the test.

Early in the life of this particular moth, caterpillars live and thrive in their diet, so the authors decided to limit the ability of the larvae to disperse by creating five different edible sticks of the same nutrition. Practically, this meant that some conditions were easier for caterpillars to move forward, while other environments were sticky and led to fewer movements and more interaction between individuals.

0324 Canable Fig LG 620x620 1 (Rudolph / Rice University)

Above: Sealed enclosures where food moths were grown consisted of either sticky food (top) or food that was easy to get to from below.

After 10 generations, the researchers compared the rate of cannibalism in each group. In cases where dispersal was limited by stickiness, the extreme selfish behavior of cannibals decreased significantly over time.

“Because they lay eggs in clusters, they are more likely to be in these small family groups in a sticker diet that limits how fast they can move,” says Rudolph.

“She pushed for more local interactions, which means, in our system, more interactions with siblings. This really makes us feel like this is bringing about a change in cannibalism.”

In this scenario, it seems that the cost of cannibalism outweighs the benefits. Eating second moths can reduce competition and provide nutrition, but caterpillars are more likely to eat their siblings in troubled quarters. If enough, the convenience of eating relatives can impair the processing of their shared genes.

Over time, those moths with more cooperative impulses survived into a sticker substance.

It remains to be seen whether this finding is for other species, but the authors say their results suggest a “significant possibility” of choosing against selfish behavior for nature.

Natural selection is often described as an internal selfish force, but this does not mean that there are no advantages to cooperative behaviors in certain conditions. Some signs of this have already been seen in yeast and bacteria when their spatial structure changes. There is also some evidence that parasites are less viral to their hosts when opportunities to disperse are limited.

A similar situation can occur between humans.

“In societies or cultures where close relatives live in large family groups, for example, you might expect to see less selfish behavior than in societies and cultures, where people are more likely to be separated from their families and live around. Rudolf explains that strangers because They often have to move for work or other reasons.

For decades, evolutionary biologists have been fascinated by selfless behavior and how it originates in the animal kingdom. Extreme forms of selfish behavior, however, have been relatively ignored.

Rudolph has spent many decades trying to change that, and his new research on moths has shown just how important cannibals can be in the dynamic evolution of animals and their interactions and behaviors.

It’s worth finding out more.

The study was published in Ecology Letters.

.
This
& Quotes