[ad_1]
Francis Fannon
We see “Balkan Stream” as a continuation of “Turkish Stream”. For us, the name does not change the fact that Russia uses energy as a source of influence. There may be differences in translation, but for us, whatever the name, the pipeline is one. This was stated by the Undersecretary of State for Energy of the United States, Francis Fannon, in response to a question from “24 Chasa” on whether The United States will impose sanctions on the expansion of the Bulgarian gas transmission network in connection with the so-called “Balkan Stream”. in front of Bulgarian journalists shortly after his meeting with Energy Minister Temenuzhka Petkova.
The diplomat pointed out that the law passed in the United States regarding sanctions for “Turkish Stream” and Nord Stream 2 “is from a few years ago.
You may be referring to the updated guidelines of the law issued by Mike Pompeo in July. The CAATSA (Law Against America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions) aims to counter the malicious influence of Russia through energy. It specifically targets the Turkish mainstream, as well as A Nord Stream 2. For two years since the law was passed, we have used all kinds of diplomatic methods to encourage behavior change, but the Kremlin continues to compound the problem. In July, the Secretary of State decided that we needed to renew our guidelines, ”said Fannon. He added that the United States does not want to sanction anyone. According to him, CAATSA is a law that does not oblige Washington to impose sanctions, but does stipulate that if a problem is identified, various means must be used to enforce the law.
“For example, we have observed certain activities, we endeavor to respond through various methods, we turn to many stakeholders to gather information. We are actively doing this for Nord Stream. We are looking at specific patterns of behavior to control Russia in this region throughout throughout the Turkish project. “But our goal is not to impose sanctions, but to change behavior. Therefore, we are in the process of speaking out and will continue to do so, “Fannon said.
As for the Belene nuclear power plant, the politician considers that the project is commercially and technically bad and will not be able to protect the energy security of our country. According to him, it is based on outdated technology and Russia refuses to use it at home.
“Why does Bulgaria want to be a test case for outdated technology?” Asked Fannon.
[ad_2]
