[ad_1]
Danail and Grisha Ganchevi
Litex Property, controlled by Grisha Ganchev’s son Danail, has lost a final claim on ownership of the land of the Shabla student camp, the Sega newspaper reported.
Litex Property acquired 10 decars in the Shablenski Pyasatsi area after a 2005 exchange, but is now losing land. It turned out that at the time of the exchange the property did not belong at all to the National Forest Administration, and the Ministry of Education and Science and the Administration had no right to replace it.
This is clear from the judgment of the Supreme Court of Cassation, by which the court did not allow Litex Property to appeal against the lower court’s decision in favor of the Ministry of Education. This concludes a judicial saga that lasted several years to protect property.
The case documents illustrate a series of interesting transfer transactions with the property. The 10-decare parcel became the property of the private company “Jitrade” EOOD on June 3, 2005 as a result of an exchange agreement with the forest management. A month later, on July 18, Jitrade sold the property to another company, Leader. In 2010, the leader in question contributed the property in Shabla as a non-cash contribution to the capital of Litex Property.
Later, it turned out that this property was not part of the forest fund at all. A few months before the property was replaced, the government decided to transfer it to the new state-owned company, Student Recreation and Sports, under the auspices of the Ministry of Education. On January 24, 2005, “Student Recreation and Sports” was established, and its capital includes the Shabla camp with 38 bungalows and four other buildings. In this cabinet decision, the camp is indicated with a smaller area and this is one of the arguments for Litex Property to continue to claim ownership.
In the course of the court case, the Dobrich District Court determined that even before 1990 the property was permanently fenced with a wire fence, covering an area of 10,373 decars and thus included in the foreground of the area, approved in 2002. that the bungalows were built on the territory of the entire property, including its boundaries, and accepted that the will of the Council of Ministers in 2004 was to contribute to the capital of the company the entire camp and not a separate part of it an area of 5 decars. As the state order in favor of the Ministry of Education and Science predates the exchange, the exchange contract and subsequent transactions do not have actual transfer effect, the court decided.
[ad_2]
