Stepan Hindlian: I have not pledged to Papazov to keep his secrets!



[ad_1]

“I have not promised to keep the secrets of Konstantin Papazov, and Levski supporters voted for Nasko Sirakov when he wanted to run the club, not for Papazov.” This was stated in an interview with “Horizon” on BNR by Stepan Hindlian, president of Levski’s PPC.

This is what he said:

“35% of the shares should not be in Konstantin Papazov. We voted for Sirakov when he declared himself as the person who will save Levski football club. We did not tell Sirakov: we trust you 51% and we trust Papazov at 35 I have not committed to Papazov to keep his secrets. The money for the salaries of Levski players went through Papazov’s company “Mish-mash” Ltd. At the same time, I was aware that this money is not His and it came from somewhere. So I asked why this is being kept secret. When Levski announced that the money had been returned, I heard about Papazov. He told me the money was from Stoyne Manolov. I didn’t expect that answer. And it doesn’t matter. whose money it is, and the way it happens.

Sirakov said: “I am Nasko Sirakov and I guarantee full transparency.” So Levski in the person of Nasko Sirakov, Konstantin Papazov and Pavel Kolev have a different interpretation of transparency. They explained that there will be transparency for Levski’s money at the end, but not at the entrance. What does this mean? Transparency in Levski must be total, not only in the outflow of money. When it’s unclear where the funds come from at the club, various suspicions arise. And Levski doesn’t need it. There is no plan of action if Levski does not get out of this vortex of his obligations, there is no plan “A”, much less plan “B”.

This is how we will conduct it. They repaired a hole with Stoyne Manolov’s money, but it’s time for new player salaries. Will we handle it like this again, repair holes? Levski is in an extreme situation. To get out of such a situation, you need to be prepared for radical measures. To tolerate the negative aspects of such radical and unpopular measures, you must have the will and character to follow this path. “

Stepan Hindlian: The way Papazov talks and associates with Levski is a disgrace

Stepan Hindlian: The way Papazov talks and associates with Levski is a disgrace

“Who are you to fix the relationship between the followers?”



[ad_2]