[ad_1]
Hristo Ivanov (right) will say with whom a coalition is possible only after the campaign.
Hristo Ivanov surprisingly saw opportunities for an alliance with GERB without its leader, social media was seething with comments
The new republicans already announce common values with “democratic Bulgaria”
Moving cautiously to the right, where surprising coalition offers surrounding the upcoming parliamentary elections marked the final weekend of politically hot September.
Hristo Ivanov’s hand to GERB turned out to be the most violently talked about among Democrats and other protesters and generated the most reactions on social media.
He did it from a high platform: the air of the “Panorama” on Friday at BNT. Coalition with GERB, but only if Boyko Borissov resigns as its president, saw the co-president of Democratic Bulgaria as possible.
“What is GERB
without Borisov?
This is coming
to learn
Let’s see if normal people in GERB, as they are, will be able to differentiate themselves sufficiently from this phenomenon and condition. I doubt it, but let’s see, “he said when asked if a coalition with GERB is possible without the current prime minister.
“There are issues that we are willing to discuss with everyone, but that does not mean that we are prepared to enter a management,” explained the face of D. He stressed that Borisov’s permanence in any political function was not acceptable.
He categorically ruled out a coalition with the BSP, because “it is still a red line, and its president Cornelia Ninova cannot stop taking pictures with Todor Zhivkov.” But otherwise, the answer with whom they will form a coalition would come after the campaign, and now with their party members they want a mandate to change the political system and modernize Bulgaria.
Immediately on Facebook, fans on the right determined the offer of a coalition with GERB
The “trick” of
Bozhidar
Lukarski
– These words were omitted in “24 Chasa” by the then leader of the UDF in 2014 to explain how after the votes that GERB is a sworn opponent, the reformist bloc matured for a government alliance with them.
Thus, according to an old Bulgarian democratic tradition, Ivanov had to explain what he wanted to say. He did so with a subsequent post on Facebook, in which he announced that he was not well understood and that “GERB is not a suitable topic for a coalition!”
“It has been tried many times and I have said it many times. This is a leading absorption co-mortgage, mortgaged at the Sheds and serving Peevski and his ilk. The meaning of all my efforts is to destroy this model and its systemic preconditions, and this is what we seek for the support of the voters. We are not talking at all about government coalitions and we are not dealing with hypotheses. We want a democratic mandate for democratic Bulgaria, through which we can radically modernize the country. Give up! ”He wrote on the web.
Otherwise, according to Ivanov, there were only two complete political formations: “Democratic Bulgaria” and the MRF, and all the others are in the process of transformation or emergence.
Only with “Democratic Bulgaria” did Tsvetanov’s new party – “Republicans for Bulgaria” share his values, it was clear from the recognition of their leader. Conversations with others would take place only “if necessary”.
“On some of the important issues like judicial reform, e-government, education, many things
we would do it
overlaid with
What they have
“It is democratic
Bulgaria ”,
he told BNR. “If necessary, we would talk to other political formations, but on a principled basis and with certain parameters,” Tsvetanov added, even before his money was officially registered. And for an alliance with the socialists, he announced: “We are in the center-right of the political spectrum and it will be important for us to have more representatives of this spectrum.”
“In no way would I say that I support Rumen Radev. I support the democratic-minded Bulgarian citizens, who have been spontaneously protesting for more than 80 days,” Tsvetanov said in response to GERB’s accusations that he had become one of the major critics of the president. Politics was not a way to satisfy only his personal or party ego.
[ad_2]