[ad_1]
Son wants $ 87,000 in compensation for destroyed collection
Unfortunately, litigation between children and parents is not uncommon, but it is generally about property disputes or breach of lifetime care obligations against inheritance. However, an American managed to take a completely new course in the field of justice in the field of family disputes, bringing his parents to trial because they threw away his collection of pornographic films and magazines. And not only did he do it, he managed to win the first, especially important part of the test.
David Working, 42, convinced the Michigan District Court that valuable items worth $ 29,000 had been destroyed. It consists of 400 videotapes, 1,600 dividends, men’s magazines and sex toys. You’ve been collecting them for years, diligently recording how much they cost. His list is 17 pages long, according to the US media.
In 2016, the son got divorced and went to live with his parents for ten months until he decided how to move on. His collection is also kept secretly, which he hides in the basement. Later he moved to Indiana and insisted that it be sent to him. But Beth’s mother and Paul’s father refuse. From the emails sent to the court, which they exchanged, it is clear that there was a lot of controversy on the subject. In one, they remind him that they told him that he could not bring his collection of pornography home and that if they found it, it would be destroyed. When they find it, they are so shocked by some of the things they see that they lock them in a safe for fear that they are illegal searches and have a problem with the police.
Honestly David, I did you a big favor by getting rid of all these things, the father wrote in one of the emails. According to him, the process of destroying them took a long time, as they had to deal with 12 boxes of video media and magazines and two more with sex toys. In messages to his son, Paul warns him that there are things in his collection that cannot be taken for granted. “David, I find your whole attitude towards women very disturbing. They are not objects to masturbate to, but people created by God like you, and you should treat them with respect and dignity,” wrote the father.
It is clear from his correspondence that his son’s attraction to pornography began when he was still a student. In high school, he joined a gang that profited from sharing photos and movies with underage girls. Upon learning of this, his parents sought help from the police and the school administration, as it turned out that his classmates were also involved in the vicious business. This act ruins the relationship between them. When David gets married, they think it will be a problem for Mary, who loves him, and not for them, and they hope that she can save him from his addiction to vulgar sex.
However, this is not happening. After 10 years of marriage, full of scandals on the subject, his wife expelled him and demanded a divorce. While the divorce is pending, David remains on the street. His mother’s heart did not last, and although they did not have a long-term relationship, in 2015 Beth wrote to him with a proposal to send him warm winter clothes and invited him to return to his hometown for a time while he recovered. The condition is that there is no pornography during the stay, which violates.
The parents’ attorney testified in court that they had the right to throw away his collection of movies, magazines and sex toys after he did not comply with their request. “We are not surprised that he lied to us, as he lied to us about a number of other things during the ten months that he lived with us, but we are in awe of the magnitude of the intention and today we are beginning to destroy it,” said one of the emails. of the father. to David. In another, he notes, “I did you a favor by throwing these things away.”
Angry, the son called the police to report his parents. He initially demanded triple damages of $ 87,000 as punishment for the “reckless destruction of your property,” but at this stage the court has not yet decided whether to uphold his claim in full. District Judge Paul Maloney only ruled that they were not allowed to dispose of his collection because it was not left. She was part of the things they agreed to send to their new address in Indiana, and they, as their owners for a specified period, violated this agreement, as evidenced by emails exchanged between them, and the parents admitted to several times during the process. “The defendants do not invoke any law or jurisprudence to support their claim that homeowners can destroy property they don’t like,” the judge said. He gave the family until February to agree on the amount of compensation.
The parents’ attorney hired an expert from the Nevada Erotic Heritage Museum to help evaluate the destroyed items. So he hopes to prove that they are not as expensive as David claims and prevent Beth and Paul from paying him thousands of dollars.
Adult movies pose an erection risk
Men who watch a lot of porn have a higher risk of developing erectile dysfunction when they have sex with a partner, a new study shows. It was carried out in Denmark and Belgium, where it turned out that around a third of the respondents are more aroused by observing someone else’s sexual activities than by practicing them themselves.
3,267 men over 16 years of age were interviewed, who had to answer 118 questions about the frequency of viewing pornography, masturbation and sexual activity. They were found to spend an average of 70 minutes a week observing sexual content, most often between 5 and 15 minutes. However, 90% of those interviewed admitted that when they are alone they do not watch a complete video, but instead jump to the most erotic scenes in search of faster pleasure.
“We found an extremely important link between time spent viewing pornography and increasing difficulty with erectile function during contact with a partner,” said Professor Günther de Win, head of the research team. According to him, there is no doubt that pornography determines the way we view sex. “Only 65% of men feel that having sex with a partner is more exciting than adult movies. Also, 20 percent believe that they should watch more extreme porn to get the same level of arousal as before,” he explains. the scientist.
It was previously thought that erectile dysfunction increased with age, but more and more studies show difficulties among young people. That is why scientists are trying to find the reasons for this. Among the factors described so far are stress, being overweight, abuse of alcohol, cigarettes and opiates and, more recently, easier access to pornographic content due to the massive penetration of the Internet in our lives.
A study by the European Association of Urology found that 23% of men in the EU under the age of 35 have some level of erectile dysfunction. Another 2016 study found that 14 percent of those under the age of 40 often have erection problems.
[ad_2]
