[ad_1]
Comment on Polina Paunova’s Facebook
When Christmas comes … with 200
Understand, there is no “definitive evidence” that the antifungal packages, bars, guns, and creams we saw in the photos of the prime minister’s state bedroom reflect “objective reality.” Thus, the Sofia City Prosecutor’s Office announced that it was suspending the investigation into the photos in question. He pointed to another reason: “not to reveal the author of the crime.”
So, sleep well, children. The prime minister is innocent. There is no “definitive evidence” that Borisov puts bars and lumps on his nightstand, or that he has fungus. Although I am genuinely concerned about mycosis … But leave it at that – the Prime Minister has overcome COVID, he will have skin problems (if there are, because we don’t know anything about “objective reality”).
However, the SGP points out that for a few seconds in the video (the one that also came out of the prime minister’s bedroom in Boyana) you can see the reflection of the author of the video. It is about “a woman in a black sleeveless dress, with a bracelet on her arm, with dark hair, but due to the poor quality, in addition to being a reflection, it is difficult for the expert to determine more details.” The identity of the woman has not been established.
But it has not been established by the prosecution. Borisov knows who she is.
Here’s a parenthesis: remember the Prime Minister yelling over the leaked audio recordings that were “deep forgeries”? Then he gave them back, huh? And he forgot about the “deep falsification” and began to explain that he was talking like that. Maybe it was some kind of apology to Mrs. Kardzhali, who wasn’t even from there, but whatever it is, the prosecution fixed it: there is no evidence of a crime. Now I’m going to close the parenthesis: so … the prime minister could first explain that the phone calls were fake, but he didn’t say anything about the video. He even said that he knew who the “beautiful lady” was.
He then gave details, which he remembers when he was alone with them, how he gave an interview during that time (although on the days when the photos were taken Borisov did not give an interview, or was kept secret). And Mata Hari compared her. Kill hari.
Well, the prosecution has not established who is the “beautiful lady”, our Mata Hari is still a mystic for society. Only the Prime Minister knows who she is. This raises a lot of questions: first of all about the safety of the lady in question, but we’ve already discussed these, so we won’t ask again.
However, I wonder, out of curiosity and neighbors (he lives in House 5 of Boyana) if Mr. Geshev asked Borisov who this beautiful lady is. METER?
I also wonder if one of the supervising prosecutors, Boryana Betsova, asked Borisov about the name of the lady, which he claims to know with such confidence. By the way, do you remember the prosecutor Betsova and the failures of the prosecution in court (in which she participated): the Biserov case, the completed investigation against Delyan Peevski? (I regret to be setting an example only with the GERB leader now and before with the MRF officials. No, they are not. They just need to be reminded of the facts).
However, leave that too. The important thing is that Christmas is coming … with 200, as he says about another situation, a voice that resembled Boris’s. Ah! You remember that the same voice as with 200 … recounted what a certain Geshev said to him: “I like to pretend I’m crazy, but you pretend to be very successful.”
Bulgaria
[ad_2]
