[ad_1]
Photos from Prime Minister Boyko Borissov’s bedroom may show gold bullion and wads of euros in his nightstand drawer, but there is no definitive evidence that this is objective reality. The prosecution reached this conclusion after several months of inspection. The photos with bales, gold and a pistol were distributed during the summer. Shortly afterwards a video appeared from the bedroom of the government villa in Boyana. In it you can also briefly see the photographer, a woman with black hair. This can be established at each closest inspection of the record. From the announcement of the prosecution it is clear that this is exactly what has been done: it has been established that there is a woman in the images, her clothes and the bracelet have been noticed. Nothing more, because the quality is bad and its identity cannot be established.
What is reality?
The check of the photos and the recording of Borisov’s bedroom was formed in the summer. One of the supervising prosecutors was Boryana Betsova from the Sofia City Prosecutor’s Office. Over the years, he has observed a number of cases that ended in failure for the prosecution, such as that of former MRF deputy Hristo Biserov. In 2014, he ended an investigation into a signal against another party deputy: Delyan Peevski and her mother Irena Krasteva.
In fact, the current investigation was launched on suspicion that someone had illegally recorded Borissov. No data has been found on such a crime, it is clear from the conclusions. It has been established when the examined photos were taken and that there is minimal interference with them. In any case, the prosecution emphasizes that these are not the original files, so the conclusions may not be entirely correct.
“Some of them have changed the filming dates: 2013, 2021, 2024, while the dates extracted through the experience of the archives are September 25, 2017, January 4, 2019 and February 6, 2019 One of the photos is reduced in size. According to the expert’s opinion, two of the photos show that the objects on the bedside table are arranged very similarly, although the photos themselves, according to data extracted from the archives, must have been taken in an extremely long period of time – almost a year and a half“says the conclusion.
The conclusion about whether the captured situation corresponds to reality is extremely interesting. Prosecutors insist there is no evidence of a crime related to the filming, that is. the prime minister is innocent.
“Based on these circumstances, the supervising prosecutors do not find that there is evidence in the case of a crime related to the nature of the items in the photos and video, the origin of these items, or the regime of their possession, which requires separation. of materials under the PPC. This is because, regardless of the crime under the Penal Code that is being investigated, the main question to answer is whether the material evidence in the case reflects objective reality. In the established factual situation, after taking all the possible actions of the investigation at the time, no definitive evidence has been collected in this regard.“writes the prosecutor’s office.
NSOs are innocent too, but the prime minister may be a victim
The other important conclusion is that the photos were hardly taken by NSO employees. In practice, they have also been acquitted by the prosecution. However, the materials were sent to the military prosecutor’s office to check whether the service had made any mistakes.
In addition to being innocent, the prime minister may be the victim of a scenario, researchers say. The goal is to discredit him. This assumption was given by witnesses during the inspection and, according to the prosecution, should not be underestimated.
“This hypothesis goes hand in hand with other tests established in the course of the investigation: from the technical experience prepared, it can be inferred that the recording and filming of the video were carried out by persons other than the employees of the NSO; There are file data manipulations and the actual recording date cannot be set“prosecutors write.
Who is Mata Hari?
More recently, the prime minister made it clear that he knew who took the pictures from his bedroom. He explained that it was a lady with whom he had an intimate relationship. Borisov did not mention her name, but compared her to Mata Hari. It is not clear whether the prosecution knows who Mata Hari is. Your message did not address this issue at all. However, it is emphasized that it is not possible to establish whose objects are photographed, ie. gold and bales.
Did you find this article helpful?
We will be happy if you support the electronic edition Mediapool.bg, so that you can continue to rely on an independent, professional and honest information analysis medium.
Support us
Subscribe to the most important news, analysis and commentary on the day’s events. The newsletter is sent to your email address every day at 18:00.
Subscription
[ad_2]
