Prof. Mihail Mirchev with the first comment after his dismissal from Sofia University for “hate speech”

Professor Mihail Mirchev commented on his dismissal from Sofia University for using “hate speech”.

Recall that the students accused Professor Mirchev of saying that the Roma are “a very aggressive community”, the Pakistanis and Afghans are “primitive cultural norms from the 7th century”, and the black and Arab immigrants in Italy are “aggressive and not willing to integrate a minority “.

After scandalous statements: Sofia University fired Professor Mihail Mirchev

This is what the teacher wrote:

The scandal against me at the University of Sofia is over. On day 36. See the argument …

In the first part, I was convinced that the accusations and their speculations were essentially rejected. In the second part, the references of the Ethics Commission to the members of the Code of Ethics of the professors of the University of Sofia are presented. But the references sound quite controversial. The third part is the sentence. I perceive it as disproportionate …

Finally, there are declarations of loyalty to the University.

Comments and counter-comments following the dismissal of Professor Mirchev for “hate speech”

Here, after all, I personally thank the Rector Prof. Anastas Gerdjikov. I spoke to him three times. I am impressed by his high intellectual and professional level. In the case, he showed a personal desire to be as balanced as possible … I am aware of the pressure he was under.

I appreciate your personal collegiality. Finally, I sincerely thank my colleagues from the Faculty of FNOI, formerly FNPP. We worked very well together for 22 years. I have taught almost 10 subjects here. I keep doing my job. And to be honest with the facts of life. Young people need it, even more so today.

Be healthy. Happy New Year 2021. I believe that through it many of the ties will loosen around our necks and souls, wrote Professor Mirchev on Facebook, after today the University’s Ethics Commission ruled and announced that it was terminating its civil contract .