[ad_1]
“Ninova is a particle in the history of the BSP, which the wind will carry with time. The problem is where the BSP is going, with whom and why it is betraying itself. I have nothing to do with the withdrawal of so many members The leadership caused many comrades to say goodbye at some point.
This was stated by the former president of BSP Mihail Mikov to NOVA.
He also commented on the local vote, which took place a few days ago. “In the by-elections in two of the municipalities, Srelcha and Septemvri, no candidate was named. These cities are iconic for the party. In this parliament mandate, the BSP supported weaponry, in which Bulgaria also participates.” party of “left”, if it is not against the war, what then is the left?
When asked if his colleagues should leave the MP banks, as requested by Ninova, Mikov had this to say:
“Everyone chooses whether to leave the parliamentary group or the parliament. Companions will be subject to pressure, spitting. It is not the first time that the deputies have left the group. This is a matter of personal judgment. I cannot agree that a deputy is elected only by party votes. “
He said he did not know how relations would develop at the BSP.
“They are living people who at some point can make a personal assessment and leave. Rather, Ninova should strive to keep members around the ideas at home, “Mikov explained.
According to him, the “left” has been severely fragmented for years.
“This happened 3-4 years ago, when Ninova dissolved the BSP Left Bulgaria.” This fragmentation took place once as a division between communists and social democrats and a second time within the BSP itself, “added Mihov.
“We will not make a new party, because there is still the possibility that the socialists, who are in the BSP, understand what kind of replacement is taking place at the top of the party. There is a mismatch between words and deeds.” The opposition as a term it was coined quite speculatively by Ninova and was conveniently used throughout the purge campaign, “said the former BSP leader.
“I believe that the BSP should be prepared for the opposition, because in the long term the party may have to make compromises that hide risks to its existence,” Mikov concluded.
Bulgaria
[ad_2]
