[ad_1]
“Since the spring of this year, there has been a dramatic deterioration in the quality of the legislation. The National Assembly has entered a frenzy, realizing how little time is left for the end of its term.” This was told to BNR Ivanka Ivanova, adviser to President Rumen Radev on legal issues.
He added that during the voting on the Electoral Code, if the so-called “referents” of the administration of the National Assembly, more paradoxical situations would have arisen:
“There was a text that was voted on three times, which is scandalous and contrary to the Constitution, which requires the approval of laws in two votes.”
“There are serious obstacles to allowing joint voting for both automatic voting and ordinary voting. The GERB is changing its position in a very short time. Previously, the introduction of automatic voting had full support, with nothing being done to take administrative measures that require the application of the law. Now again a mixed version is allowed, which is contested by lawyers, political scientists and experts “, added Ivanova.
She sees an opportunity for another to create a problem related to the president’s veto and the lifting of the ban on holding referendums on issues that fall within the purview of the Grand National Assembly.
According to the adviser to the head of state, the government’s project for a new Constitution is completely insolvent and in total contradiction with the principles established for the quality of education.
“This is an illiterate copy of the current Constitution.”
Ivanova pointed out another problem in the current Constitution: the inconsistent implementation of the principle of separation of powers:
There is a great figure there, like the chief prosecutor, who has been raised as a separate constitutional figure in our country and who in recent years has seen that he cannot emancipate himself from his totalitarian role of serving as the backbone of a ruling party. It can be resolved with some moderate changes within the ordinary National Assembly, it does not find its solution in the draft of a new Constitution ”.
As another serious problem mentioned by Ivanka Ivanova:
“If we know who is exercising political influence over prosecutors, and if it is political, we can counter it when it violates the Constitution. Now we are in a situation where the fetishized independence of prosecutors is equated with that of judges and allows the forces to not institutional solve the election of the Attorney General, the election of the members of the College of Prosecutors.
Bulgaria
[ad_2]
