[ad_1]
“It has been clear for a long time that this is a political case. My information, the prosecution did not withdraw the accusation.”
This was written on her Facebook account by the director of the Bulgarian Pharmaceutical Union, Asena Stoimenova.
Yesterday, the case against him for causing panic during the epidemic was stopped and returned to the prosecution.
With the events of the last few months, we have become convinced that one of the easiest things in Bulgaria is to get an indictment and ask questions like “why?” and “how is it possible?” and the provision of evidence in the course of the preliminary proceedings is an exercise without much sense. “
However, I have several questions for the prosecutor’s office, writes Stoimenova. Are here:
“Is the expression of an expert opinion announcing global trends in drug supply in the media a sign of concern?
Can accurate and objective information, previously published and made public (at that time only for those who use English, and which later appeared in interviews in Bulgarian and others) qualify as a sign of concern?
Why the prosecution defines an expert opinion based on official information as a signal of false alarm, even more so considering the fact that the prosecution that presented the accusation against me (Sofia District Prosecutor’s Office) weeks before my interviews instructs to the BDA to check for insulin deficiency?
Why does the prosecution consider that the Bulgarian Medical Union is a competent body to determine the shortage of medicines, since no law or ordinance defines it as such and attracts its president as a witness?
Who and why ordered two tax inspections for a period of 5 years (for me as an individual and for the Bulgarian Pharmaceutical Union) just two weeks after the indictment was delivered?
In a state governed by the rule of law, everyone has the right to have a say, and when this right is exercised, it is not cause for concern. My words correspond to the objective circumstances and have no adverse consequences.
The main question remains: “Why is all this possible?” The question has not long been “Who?”, Because if we live in a state governed by the rule of law, the laws are obeyed. We are all important and protected by the law, and no one, whoever they may be, can stimulate the system to act in any other way than that which guarantees the search and the triumph of objective truth ”, concluded Asena Stoimenova.
Bulgaria
[ad_2]
