[ad_1]
On the feast of September 6, we again heard the speeches of politicians, which can also be interpreted as a message to the people. The sociologist Mira Radeva and the political scientist Parvan Simeonov tried to explain what is behind their words in the current situation of crisis and protests for more than 60 days on “This Morning”.
“I would not stop at the specific situation of September 6, but at this emotional level, this emotional tone, which disturbs me a lot. I do not know why in politics the ratio goes back and we are all a channel of emotionality that we cannot control. It is perfectly clear that our political model is in a severe crisis, but when you have serious problems it is difficult to solve them by screaming, like in a family, ”said Mira Radeva.
According to Simeon Parvanov, on September 6 we heard three messages. The first is for the president to unite against the “gang”, the second is for Borissov to unite in general – “let’s not divide the nation,” said Karakachanov, “unification is for you two to feel and understand each other.”
“All three things are true. What worries me the most is that they form two little agitators who listen only to themselves and believe only in themselves, and during this time the impartial audience will start to look the other way,” Parvanov said , according to whom the society sympathizes with protest, but that can change.
“The protest is taking place in Boyko Borissov. This is paradoxical, but he is so cornered that there is no way he can get to the door, “Parvanov said, adding that for the prime minister, the conflict is currently on the sidelines and it is too late to talk about his resignation.
Borisov wonders where this came from. He thought 2020 would be his round of applause, especially since he had a high situational rating for the coronavirus crisis, Parvanov said.
Borissov made a lot of mistakes with excessive pressure and ambition regarding the coronavirus. And the general situation of bans makes people nervous, “said sociologist Mira Radeva.
According to her, the debate on the constitution should take place outside the parliament, which does not enjoy much confidence. “This project does not bring the change that people expect,” Radeva said.
Parvanov drew a parallel with the 2013 protest, when numerous artistic actions caused him to lose his temper, now the organizers have avoided it by radicalizing him on September 2, but this in turn has repelled some of the unprejudiced and is now possible. It would be good for the organizers of dissatisfaction to return to performances like in 2013.
Borissov is waiting for the protest to run out, partisan and weak, and this is quite possible. Radev is also in a strong position and can “feed” civil unrest, the political scientist said.
See more in the video.