The call came after another anonymous grand jury issued a statement saying the panel had not been given a chance to consider murder charges in a case against a police officer who arrested Taylor at her home the night she was killed. .
“The current situation also raises serious concerns, as many large juries are now claiming that Attorney General Cameron is not truthful about what happened in the old jury process before the people,” Bachier said in a statement. , And the next step, all the information, the evidence, the grand jury conversation, whether recorded or not – everything should be published. “
CNN has contacted Cameron’s office fee to comment.
Two anonymous grand jurors make statements about the proceedings
“The grand jury did not explain to him the homeside crimes,” the first anonymous grand jury wrote in a statement released Tuesday by Kevin Glover. “The grand jury never heard about these laws. It never explained self-defense or justice.”
Another grand jury on Thursday echoed that statement. Another panel member said the jury was only allowed to consider three absent risks against one officer.
“Nothing else has been allowed to be considered,” the junior juror said, adding that he “wholeheartedly” agreed with the first juror’s statement and continued to help move the record straight. ”
The first grand jury said “questions were asked about the additional charge” and the members were told that “there is nothing to be found because the plaintiffs do not think they can stick to them.”
“The grand jury did not agree that certain actions were justified or could not decide whether there should be an indictment in Barrow’s Taylor case,” the first jury said. “This grand jury was not given the opportunity to deliberately report those allegations and was only deliberated on what was presented to them. I can’t speak for other judges, but I can help tell the truth.”
Cameron says he asked the panel to lay charges on allegations that could be proven
Cameron said in a statement posted on Twitter earlier this week that he would not appeal the decision allowing the grand jury to speak.
He said he asked a jury of funds to charge him with an allegation that could be proved in court.
“Under the law, allegations obtained in the absence of sufficient evidence do not arise and are basically not justified by anyone,” he wrote.
He also wrote that “cause, justification and (other legal issues) are always at the forefront of his office’s investigation.”
The attorney general has admitted that this is the only charge his lawyers have recommended to the grand jury. Cameron said the plaintiffs presented all the evidence, however, the facts show that force was not used by the two officers as they were fired.
Taylor’s family lawyer, Sam Aguirre, said in a statement on Tuesday: “Daniel Cameron is ashamed of himself. He made the decision based on his political agenda.”
Ben Krump, another attorney for Taylor’s family, reiterated his call for the appointment of a new independent prosecutor on Tuesday.
The state argued that allowing the jurors to speak could compromise the trial
Cameron’s appeal fee requested that any court order allowing the jury to speak in public be withheld until a potential state appeal.
The state argues that allowing the grand jury to speak could compromise the right to a fair hearing for former officer Brett Hankinson.
But O’Connell said Hankison did not join the argument or raise the issue himself, so he ruled that he could not find that the concern was “established in reality.”
Hankison was charged with endangering three types of criminal vows, but none of the officers involved in the raid directly charged Taylor with death. Hanks has pleaded not guilty to those charges. No other officers were charged.
Hankison’s attorney, Steve Mathews, made no comment Tuesday.
Cameron led the police investigation into the murder and presented evidence in the Jefferson County Grand Jury on the same day.
However, the recording does not include juror discussions or the plaintiff’s recommendations and statements, Cameron said.
.
