Senate Judiciary Committee Chair Lindsay Graham, RSC, concluded the first day of Supreme Court confirmation hearing of Judge Amy Connie Barrett with a tough road warning ahead.
Monday’s part of the hearing ended at 3 p.m., local time, as committee members and Barrett commented on their opening without being involved. That changes Tuesday, starting a lengthy inquiry process.
Trump looms on first day of hearing
“Tomorrow, we start the 20-minute round after the 30-minute round. Do the math, we’ve got a very long time ago,” Graham said, noting the time allotted in reference to the 22 senators sitting on the 22 seats. Committee. “Then relax a little.”
Starting at 9 a.m. Eastern time, each senator will take their turn on hot-button legal issues such as their background, past judicial decisions, overall judicial philosophy, knowledge, abortion or health care, or issues related to that man. Who named him President, Trump.
Looking at the first day, it seems that a large part of the Democrats’ strategy to oppose Barrett is her past criticism of the Supreme Court’s 2012 decision to uphold the Affordable Care Act, commonly known as Obamacare. One week after the November election, the Supreme Court will hear a case in which it will determine whether Obamacare is now constitutional as the penalty is no longer attached to a personal order.
The role of the Supreme Court by my cheerful Barrett, he says he is ‘not ready to solve every problem’.
In 2012, the court – in an opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts – ruled that the penalty is a tax and therefore linked to the power of the Constitutional Congress. The Trump administration argues that there are no longer penalties, no constitutional basis for the order and that the whole thing should fall as a result.
2020 Vice Presidential Candidate Sen. Many Democrats, including Kamala Harris, D-Calif, accused Trump and fellow Republicans of wanting to hasten and confirm Barrett so he could sit on the bench to hear arguments in the case as a key vote in the case. Remove Obamacare for good.
Elura Nanos of Law and Crime said, however, that the other six judges have records that conform to the principle of exclusivity. This means that they could potentially rule that while the order is unconstitutional, other parts of the Affordable Care Act could survive.
The new look three years ago will also provide a glimpse of how Democrats may question Barrett. During her Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals confirmation hearing in 2017, she sensed about her religious background and beliefs. Diane Feinstein, D-California., And Dick Durbin, D-Beer.
Finstein criticized Barrett at the time, saying “confidence lives loud inside you,” and that it was “worrying.” Durbin asked Barrett if she was a “rhetorical Catholic”, borrowing a term used in a law review article she co-wrote in 1998 as a student.
Click here to get the Fox News app
On Monday, Sen. Josh Haley Wali, R-Mo., Defended Barrett from such potential attacks, claiming they harmed freedom of religion.
“This bedrock principle of American independence is now under attack,” Howell said. “That’s when my Democratic allies repeatedly questioned Judge Barrett and others about their religious beliefs.”
The report was contributed by Avi Fordham of Fox News.
