[ad_1]
The judge announced the decision “in the middle of the taking of evidence,” said lawyer Michael Hecht, who represents the state of Lower Austria. “For all additional considerations, the written decision of the Federal Administrative Court must be awaited.”
According to the office of Mobility Advisor Ludwig Schleritzko (ÖVP), the trial is expected in a few weeks or months. An expert’s report had already confirmed that the project was not in line with the conservation objectives of the European protected area, because the road was to be built through the protected breeding area of the endangered bird Triel.
“There is not much chance that the S8 will pass,” summarized a spokesman for the state council. Schleritzko had already described the development of the procedure as “worrying”.
For Wolfgang Rehm of the environmental organization VIRUS and the Marchfeld Citizen Initiative (BIM), approval is “practically impossible” due to the status of the archive. Even “massive but inappropriate attack attempts by the Asfinag project applicants and the state of Lower Austria would have failed,” he said in a broadcast.
“Perhaps an expert opinion is needed to confirm that the construction of the S8 will improve the quality of life of more than 50,000 directly affected neighbors to finally reach a positive decision,” shared the speaker of the third state parliament, Karin Renner and Gerhard Razborcan (both SPÖ) with. Dieter Dorner (FPÖ) described the report as “pure and unrealistic harassment for the compatriots who suffer every day from mass trafficking”.
“Not a bird to protect has spoiled the project, but ill-thought-out planning by the state government,” said Edith Kollermann of NEOS. “What is needed is the rapid relief of the people of the region, which has always been demanded by the Greens, with small-scale detours and further expansion of public transport,” said Georg Ecker (Greens).
We inform:
S8: Approval procedure for Schleritzko “worrying”
For the State Councilor for Mobility Ludwig Schleritzko (ÖVP), the development of the procedure continued on Tuesday for the approval of the Marchfeld highway (S8) by the Federal Administrative Court (BVwG) is “worrying”.
The expert had again given a bad report to the S8 because it was going to be built through the protected breeding area of the endangered bird Triel, as confirmed by the regional council office a report from the “Kurier”.
The Lower Austrian provincial government had already created a new legal situation in April with a unanimous adjustment of the protected area. “The state of Lower Austria supports the construction of the Marchfeld highway in order to provide the affected people with a better quality of life and the economy the basis for successful development,” Schleritzko said at the time.
“I don’t understand individual car opponents”
“In my report, I came to the conclusion that the construction of the S8 in the form submitted for approval is not in line with the conservation goals of the European protected area ‘Sandboden und Praterterrasse’,” expert Georg Bieringer said according to the report. “Kurier”. There are alternative routes for the road that do not burden the bird. The renewed planning would delay the project “by at least 15 years”, Gänserndorf Mayor Rene Lobner (ÖVP) was quoted as saying.
“I have no sympathy for the opponents of individual cars who want to deprive thousands of people of the opportunity for a better quality of life with their stunts,” Schleritzko said in a broadcast. “Neither I nor the residents of Marchfeld see if the development of an entire region is impeded by a bird that has never been seen there,” he continued. A negative decision means a situation that has been fixed for years, in which “more than 24,000 vehicles, including 2,000 trucks”, circulate through the towns every day.
The FPÖ is also campaigning for the construction of the S8. She calls “an end to the unrealistic transport policy and urges a quick start to construction.” “The ultimate goal is to free the local population from the unbearable traffic hell,” says Blue Traffic spokesman Dieter Dorner.
NEOS advocate for an alternative route. For Edith Kollermann (NEOS), it was not the bird that ruined the project, but rather “the ill-thought-out planning by the state government”: “I am very clear that the citizens of Raasdorf or Deutsch-Wagram will soon see the end of your traffic load Wanting places, ”he says. Planning that reconciles the nature and interests of trafficking should have started a long time ago, says the pink politician.
[ad_2]
