[ad_1]
“Forbes” magazine was directed at Kanye West in November: “We assure you, Kanye, that we will keep a close eye on you; if you can, you will be the first to know.” It meant the billionaire ranking that the magazine created. The American rapper had reacted outraged to the fact that he was not busy with his assets. Now the time has come: “Forbes” has added the 42-year-old to the list.
But West is obviously still not satisfied: he sees his assets as undervalued by the magazine, at least that’s what “Forbes” writes. The magazine had estimated his wealth at $ 1.3 billion. To do this, he calculated the value of the artist’s assets, including his streetwear company “Yeezy” and his record label.
According to West, the estimate was too low. So, according to Forbes, he wrote an angry message to the magazine: “It’s not a billion. It’s $ 3.3 billion because nobody can count on Forbes.”
“No numbers”
The dispute between West and “Forbes” started last year. At that time, the magazine wanted to know more about his fortune. According to Forbes, West said he was “not a man of numbers”: “Asking him to translate this into numbers is like asking his grandmother what the exact recipe for the cake is.”
So West appeared on the cover of the magazine, but was not included in Reichen’s ranking. A complaint immediately followed: He had shown “Forbes” evidence of more than $ 890 million, and they still wouldn’t call him a “billionaire.” Regardless of the fact that a document of this amount was not enough, the West apparently became so angry that it announced an unusual move: it might want its name for a year in “Christian Genius Billionaire Kanye West” (translated as “Christian billionaire” Genius Kanye West “) changes,” for everyone to understand, “he said at the time.
“Forbes” had responded to the rapper’s outrage and explained why he hadn’t made it to the ranking, but that he was definitely a contender.
When West shouldn’t be on the list again, he initially reacted differently and made the requested numbers available to the magazine. According to “Forbes,” however, the numbers were exaggerated: “We tend to be somewhat skeptical about self-assessments,” the magazine writes.