[ad_1]
The government presented new measures last Monday “completely unprepared,” and then it took four days to present a legal basis for them, Rendi-Wagner recalled. The new regulation, which reduces the maximum number of people in meetings and small events away from its own four walls and also revives the distance of 1 meter in public space, was published Thursday night. Its entry into force has been postponed to Sunday. For Rendi-Wagner, the “chaos” of recent weeks continues. “Show politics” does not cope with the crisis, he stressed.
FPÖ locates a state of emergency
FPÖ club president Kickl attests to the government’s irresponsibility in its purest form. A state emergency was triggered. “All citizens, employees, businessmen, families, teachers and students, and now very recently, visitors to the All Saints’ Day cemetery are unsettled by a jumble of rules,” Kickl said angrily: prophet to know that the government is for the Austrians Christmas will also be prohibited, that did not even exist in times of war “.
“Shame for the Crown regulation”
For NEOS, health spokesman Gerald Loacker found more question marks from Health Minister Rudolf Anschober (Greens) after Thursday’s “embarrassment over Corona regulation.” The test strategy presented this week is also inadequate for Loacker. Rapid antigen testing exclusively in physician’s offices is completely impractical and does not achieve the goal of a meaningful containment strategy.
Lack of legal basis?
Viennese lawyer Florian Horn criticized the regulation published by the Ministry of Health. In his opinion, “there are still problems” with this, he said on Ö1 “Mittagsjournal”. For example, there is no legal basis for regulation on upper limits for people in small gatherings and events outside their own four walls.
The provision, according to which the number is limited to six people inside and twelve outside, is not based on the Covid Measures Law, but on the Epidemic Law. And the only thing that can be found there in the regulations of the events is that “you can only regulate the confluence of larger crowds”, according to Horn: “And ten people or twelve people or six people is definitely not a bigger crowd” .
It would be “revenge” if there was not really an appraisal. If the decision had been made to publish the draft in advance and put it up for discussion, the “quality of the regulation would be better,” argued the lawyer, complaining about the “lack of transparency.”
(Those: APA)
